Thank you so much for bring this issue to my attention. I didn't know that "the one-year extensions requires that an employment-based green card case was initially filed AT LEAST 365 DAYS PRIOR TO the requested start date for the H1B extension"!
I had an employment-based green card case pending in my previous job. This case was automatically invalidated after I changed to my current job in Feb. 2007. I should have filed another employment-based green card application. But because my employer didn't sponsor it, and also because I didn't like this company soon after I joined it, I didn't file a new application. This means, currently without a pending employment-based green card case, I wouldn't be able to make the one-year extension to my H-1B!
It seems that, the only way I can have my H-1B extended is to try to have an I-140 petition approved before the end of this year (when my H-1B expires). Am I right? Besides, I noticed that there's another condition for the 3-year extentions: "an immigrant visa number is NOT available in the particular category". For NIW petition, is this automatically satisfied because the priority date for NIW is not current?
A thousand thanks!!
回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you to app
所有跟帖:
•
回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you to
-xsz-
♂
(1224 bytes)
()
02/21/2008 postreply
10:30:01
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you
-mascotwu-
♀
(383 bytes)
()
02/21/2008 postreply
14:45:48
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for y
-xsz-
♂
(657 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
10:38:35
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late fo
-xsz-
♂
(245 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
10:52:52
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late fo
-mascotwu-
♀
(30 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:00:20
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you
-mascotwu-
♀
(92 bytes)
()
02/21/2008 postreply
14:54:17