Thank you so much for bring this issue to my attention. I didn't know that "the one-year extensions requires that an employment-based green card case was initially filed AT LEAST 365 DAYS PRIOR TO the requested start date for the H1B extension"!
I had an employment-based green card case pending in my previous job. This case was automatically invalidated after I changed to my current job in Feb. 2007. I should have filed another employment-based green card application. But because my employer didn't sponsor it, and also because I didn't like this company soon after I joined it, I didn't file a new application. This means, currently without a pending employment-based green card case, I wouldn't be able to make the one-year extension to my H-1B!
It seems that, the only way I can have my H-1B extended is to try to have an I-140 petition approved before the end of this year (when my H-1B expires). Am I right? Besides, I noticed that there's another condition for the 3-year extentions: "an immigrant visa number is NOT available in the particular category". For NIW petition, is this automatically satisfied because the priority date for NIW is not current?
A thousand thanks!!
回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you to app
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you to -xsz- ♂ (1224 bytes) () 02/21/2008 postreply 10:30:01
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you -mascotwu- ♀ (383 bytes) () 02/21/2008 postreply 14:45:48
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for y -xsz- ♂ (657 bytes) () 02/22/2008 postreply 10:38:35
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late fo -xsz- ♂ (245 bytes) () 02/22/2008 postreply 10:52:52
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late fo -mascotwu- ♀ (30 bytes) () 02/22/2008 postreply 13:00:20
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:請教!辦 NIW 的律師費, Important! It may be to late for you -mascotwu- ♀ (92 bytes) () 02/21/2008 postreply 14:54:17