see that i got from my lawyer today.

來源: hhhhh88888 2007-11-11 16:18:01 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (457 bytes)
The name of the statute is the Child Status Protection Act of 2002. The section relevant to your situation is Section 3. There is no need to file an I-824 for a child in your situation, where the child is already in the United States. But it probably wouldn't hurt anything if filing it; it would just be a waste of money.

it is right that There is no need to file an I-824 for a child where the child is already in the United States?


所有跟帖: 

wgzmb, do u think if u filed form i-824 after ur 140 -fanfan88- 給 fanfan88 發送悄悄話 (103 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 16:22:27

移民局的信裏沒提到I-824, 律師也沒交, 說140批後一直沒名 -wgzmb- 給 wgzmb 發送悄悄話 (16 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 16:41:43

but if u filed I-824 within one year after ur I-140 was approved -hhhhh88888- 給 hhhhh88888 發送悄悄話 (110 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 17:38:52

我找不到結論呀 -wgzmb- 給 wgzmb 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/12/2007 postreply 06:08:52

see the following i got from that act. seems my lawyer -hhhhh88888- 給 hhhhh88888 發送悄悄話 (566 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 17:50:23

灰色地帶 -accordion07- 給 accordion07 發送悄悄話 (165 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 17:31:45

Learn from this case -nonpro- 給 nonpro 發送悄悄話 (381 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 18:19:29

but 824 is only for kid who is not in usa while -hhhhh88888- 給 hhhhh88888 發送悄悄話 (20 bytes) () 11/12/2007 postreply 06:37:55

回複:but 824 is only for kid who is not in usa while -nonpro- 給 nonpro 發送悄悄話 (408 bytes) () 11/12/2007 postreply 07:02:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”