To norbes, nonpro and wgzmb etc: contiune Child Status Protectio

來源: Accordion07 2007-11-11 08:51:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (680 bytes)
From UCSIC we know:
immigration age = age at the time when first time* visa number becomes available after I-140 is approved - the time period during I-140 was pending
*USCIS specifically stated that in case of visa number availability retrogression, the earliest or first time visa number becomes current is used for age calculation.

But , when Wgzmb co-file I140/1495 (including his or her son), the visa number are all current for Employment Based cases. The retrogression occured later after june 2005 when Wgzmb's I140 had already been approved. So how to count "earliest or first time visa number becomes current is used for age calculation" ?

所有跟帖: 

謝謝 各位高手 是啊我找不到有了485就有效的依據 -wgzmb- 給 wgzmb 發送悄悄話 (1078 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 09:15:36

因為第一被律師申請成EB3了2005年1月140批時正好沒名額了 -wgzmb- 給 wgzmb 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/11/2007 postreply 09:20:27

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”