這樣應該沒有問題了吧，RFE for TB, 貼傑

今天去醫院拿結果，雖然沒有見到civil surgeon, 沒想到護士的態度很好。
我的rfe要求TB test.因為我有98年結果，護士就直接寫上 'pts has a positive TB test in 1998 of 14 mm', 但還是check 了 , 我也不好太爭。新做了一次X光，結果當然又是正常。

在我的要求下，護士還在comments欄中填上了'pts was recipent of BCG vaccine in China'.

但願這次沒有問題了。各位老師若有高見，恭請賜教，其實在做一次TB也是來得及的，但我總覺得'新鮮'的TB 陽性結果，會使移民官覺得有必要進一步follow up，而老的結果則說明我真的沒有肺病。

不知是否妥當？
多謝了



附昨天的帖子

RFE for TB 忍不住給移民官附了一封信，大家提提意見，謝謝

有沒有正麵意義？多謝指點

As a matter of fact, when I did the Medical Exam with the same civil surgeon two and half years ago, I presented my medical record with the TB test result which was done previously. But the doctor said as long as my X-ray check was clear, TST result was of no use. This time, after reading my RFE, he said he would include my TST record and gave me a new X-ray check.

As you can see, now I have accumulated three X-ray results. The first one is done in 1998 for record for the University; the second one was done in 2005 for initial I-693 form; and the third one was done in 2007 for this RFE. All of them are clear. I also got a TST result of 14 mm, which must be from the BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin) vaccination I received long time ago in China.

所有跟帖： 

• 標題應該是 "貼接上回" -急促不安- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2007 postreply 17:34:09

• CDC link 回複：這樣應該沒有問題了吧，RFE for TB, -MPOS- ♂ (346 bytes) () 08/03/2007 postreply 17:53:21

• 多蒙指點，謝謝 -急促不安- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2007 postreply 20:00:36

• 不客氣, 個人意見，僅供參考. Good luck! -MPOS- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2007 postreply 20:06:29