在絕望中冷靜萬勿過激！ZT

1. The new VB doesn't aim to any individual, it is generalized by the analysists.

2. They themselves didn't expect all quota was used up in June when they moved VB to Jan 2006;

3. The policy is issued based on USA national interests, not on the Chinese or Indian interests;

4. No individual sentamention or discriminationism was involved in the policy because the VB is applied to all people from all over the world, and USA is an immigrant country;

5. Chinese is only a very very small minority in the whole nationalities in the country;

6. Chinese should be calm down quickly in order to get interest they need through legal pathway （appealing by parade or calss appeal by medium etc）but not through lawsuit;

7. Based on the above claim, no lawsuit can change the situation and national policy at all;

8. AILA knows this very well and appeal the class lawsuit against USCIS or DOS, which is no use at all;

9. Item 8 can only make AILA super famous and rich, but only make no any effects on national immigrant policy a bit change at all because senate has scattered the new immigrant law admendment last Thursday. Lawsuite can only make AILA rich but can't sue agains the whole goverment, legeslation, etc.

所有跟帖： 

• tmd罵它丫的兩句就過激了?他們怎麽耍我們都該?有天理嗎? -soldanella- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:42:32

• 那你說怎麽辦。少在這裏說風涼話，站著說話不腰疼。 -昔日- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:43:17

• 它的意思是我們被玩死活該.因為是少數民族,就該被玩死 -soldanella- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:45:51

• that's bullshit. if they did it on or before 6/30, it -iiijjj- ♂ (200 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:46:17

• 寫這種東西的人是站著說話不腰痛 -灌水專用名- ♂ (494 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:51:21

• 對,支持ALIA! -manbepositive- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:52:59

• 回複：You are right!寫這種東西的人是站著說話不腰痛 -suzieQ- ♀ (67 bytes) () 07/02/2007 postreply 11:57:06