Will it have negative effect on 485 by calling USCIS frequently?

來源: pangpangxiongxiong 2007-06-26 11:17:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (75 bytes)
Will it have negative effect on 485 by calling USCIS frequently? Thanks

所有跟帖: 

They - 回複:Will it have negative effect on 485 by calling USCIS f -pjiang- 給 pjiang 發送悄悄話 pjiang 的博客首頁 (513 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 11:31:53

That sounds horrible! Do you know the threshold? Thanks! -pangpangxiongxiong- 給 pangpangxiongxiong 發送悄悄話 (11 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 11:39:52

你沒聽過老師講課嗎?- 回複:That sounds horrible! Do you know the threshold? -pjiang- 給 pjiang 發送悄悄話 pjiang 的博客首頁 (50 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 11:48:08

not even close -diesel- 給 diesel 發送悄悄話 (397 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:12:17

不太準確 on EPA Act - 回複:not even close -pjiang- 給 pjiang 發送悄悄話 pjiang 的博客首頁 (138 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:26:41

還有聽說睡覺呼魯打得太響也扣分的! -珍珠泡泡- 給 珍珠泡泡 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:54:02

USCIS made you sick? -specialist- 給 specialist 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:33:53

這都什麽亂七八糟的.最好別開玩笑. -enlai- 給 enlai 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:30:06

▲有的同學呀▲ - 回複:They - 回複:Will it have negative effect on 485 by ca -pjiang- 給 pjiang 發送悄悄話 pjiang 的博客首頁 (233 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 13:11:03

all bullshit -tttkkk- 給 tttkkk 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:41:45

Easy, guys! -珍珠泡泡- 給 珍珠泡泡 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:54:51

thresheld theory is a big fat lie, don't trust, it doesn't make -vsc-1111- 給 vsc-1111 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2007 postreply 12:54:05

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”