Use 8 U.S.R. 1447(b) NOT WOM for your case!

來源: mission08 2007-06-04 22:59:03 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (776 bytes)
AUSA responds very differently to 1447(b) cases from WOM cases especially in 9th Circuit regions, regardless Pro Se or not. Most cases they try to resolve 1447(b) cases because the law clearly requires them to adjudicate N-400 within 120 days of initial exam. In some cases AUSA argues 'initial exam' does not mean the interview but much more cases favored plaintiffs than AUSA's for that arguments so you have a easy job to fight the MTD, much easier than WOM cases.

For MTD your only choice is to fight to the end unless your NC is cleared. But in that case AUSA normally files extension or answer, not MTD.

You should list the original region's CIS director as your defendant, besides FBI (Muller), DHS (Chertoff), CIS (E. Gonzales), and AG (A. Gonzalez).
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”