Check the link I sent last time, plenty of samples

to fight MTD. You are right that CIS has decided to play tough on Pro Se WOM plaintiffs since they looked so bad when (Dr.?) Emilio Gonzalez (to me he is just a joke how those key posts were assigned by this cabinet) attended the congress hearing regarding the fee increase proposal. He was grilled with questions such as nation wide litigations and asked how he could prove the fee increase will reduce the backlog at all if all problem came from FBI etc. They simply want to scare people away with the legal process. However, given the numerous successful cases by WOM/1447(b) plaintiffs, I think they are simply looking for more embarrassment by doing this way.

所有跟帖: 

回複:Check the link I sent last time, plenty of samples -bioinfo- 給 bioinfo 發送悄悄話 bioinfo 的博客首頁 (380 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 10:31:36

I think you need to have lawyer. Try Justin Fox. -pbsize- 給 pbsize 發送悄悄話 (27 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 11:56:30

回複:I think you need to have lawyer. Try Justin Fox. -bioinfo- 給 bioinfo 發送悄悄話 bioinfo 的博客首頁 (390 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 12:15:06

回複:回複:I think you need to have lawyer. Try Justin Fox. -mission08- 給 mission08 發送悄悄話 (419 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 13:59:31

Yes, I have been working with him on my case -pbsize- 給 pbsize 發送悄悄話 (188 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 14:23:25

回複:Yes, I have been working with him on my case -bioinfo- 給 bioinfo 發送悄悄話 bioinfo 的博客首頁 (193 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 16:12:22

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!