最新消息: 打官司沒用了, 關於NC背景調查. SH!T

USCIS Clarifies Criteria to Expedite FBI Name Check.

The USCIS says that it will no longer "routinely" request the FBI to expedite a name check when the only reason for the request is because a mandamus (WOM) or other federal court petition is filed in the case.

Given the use of the word "routinely," it is possible that the USCIS could still make an expedite request in certain exceptional cases.

公民NC官司不行了, 不知道485官司還能打否:

http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ExpediteNameChk022007.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 給頂置一下吧, 想打官司的別浪費錢和精力了. 此路不通了. -撈一把- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 17:13:39

• 不讚成這種說法，又到了另一個極端，大家本來就沒有指望移民局 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (352 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 17:58:14

• 起訴的過程也是提醒CIS/FBI不要把原告的NC扔在一邊忘/丟掉 -ITWorker0214- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 18:15:35

• Several WOM cases actually were granted by Judge -d_outside- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 19:33:50

• Yes,quite a few Orders favoring plaintiff granted -ITWorker0214- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 19:54:42

• can u give some examples? as far as i knew, -selang1999- ♂ (42 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 20:12:11

• 我又有信心打官司了. 想給父母辦綠卡, 孩子5個月了, 希望父母帶過一 -撈一把- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 00:31:33

• Why people like to scare themselves? -newfei2008- ♂ (80 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 21:55:39

• Wom should still work for FBI -Tatung- ♂ (149 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 00:34:38