Xiaobaitu and other experts: about NIW 140 RFE response

來源: justlikebefore 2006-11-03 08:44:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (840 bytes)
we got RFE from NSC. It said the first 2 catergories of NIW are satisfied, but the third one is not. Then listed details requests such as citing, verification from former employer for the project contribution, letter from goverment such as NIH officer verification...

We prepared 7 new letters, including 4 independent. In the response draft, the lawyer concentrated on answering that we satisfied the third category, but to those detail questions asked in RFE, he did not directly address with a clear tone as I expected. Should not the reponse directly answer those questions one by one such as " the verification from former employer is attached as..."? Will the officer look for answer to the questions he asked in the reponse himself or he does not care if you really answer one by one?

I am confused. Thanks a lot!

所有跟帖: 

回複:Xiaobaitu and other experts: about NIW 140 RFE response -PH2003- 給 PH2003 發送悄悄話 (226 bytes) () 11/03/2006 postreply 10:46:01

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”