Please HELP!!! NSC NIW 140RFE,

來源: kinan 2006-09-22 12:35:38 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2385 bytes)
Recently got RFE from NSC for my NIW 140 application. Submiited 09/2005 to VSC and transferred to NSC this May.

The details of the RFE as follows:

1. Please any available additional documentary evidence, that, as of the petition priority date, you had a degree of influence on your field that distinguishes you from other scientists with comparable academic/professional qualifications. The evidence may include, for example, copies of addition published articles that cite or otherwise recognize your achievements. Similarly, evidence of official recognition conferred on you by governmental entities or professional organizations may also be ted. The letters you ted in support of your petition fail to establish that, through your research, have influence on your field.
2. To be considered in the national interest you must make a showing significantly above that necessary to prove the “prospective national benefit” required of all aliens seeking to qualify as “exceptional”. Exceptional is defined under Service regulations “a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the sciences, arts, or business.”
3. You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest would be adversely affected if a labor certification were required. You must demonstrate that it be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of your services by making available to U.S. workers the position you seek. If self-employed, you must also establish the national interest would be adversely affected if a labor certification were required.
4. You must establish you have a past record of specific prior achievement which justifies projections of future benefit to the national interest. You must establish, in some capacity, your ability to serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of your colleagues. You must demonstrate to some degree your influence on your field of employment as a whole.

If this a common RFE? Seems to me, they mainly challenging the 3rd point of NIW, "The foreign national will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications". Is my understanding right?

Can any one give me suggestions on how to reply this RFE?

Thanks a lot.

所有跟帖: 

回複:Please HELP!!! NSC NIW 140RFE, -tamade- 給 tamade 發送悄悄話 (361 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 12:55:43

回複:回複:Please HELP!!! NSC NIW 140RFE, -kinan- 給 kinan 發送悄悄話 (416 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 13:45:16

Your understanding is right -needwait..- 給 needwait.. 發送悄悄話 (193 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 13:19:41

回複:Your understanding is right -kinan- 給 kinan 發送悄悄話 (210 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 13:48:29

More advice? Worthit, Xiaobaitu, and other experts.. Pls. -kinan- 給 kinan 發送悄悄話 (260 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 13:55:25

回複:More advice? Worthit, Xiaobaitu, and other experts.. Pls. -WorthIt- 給 WorthIt 發送悄悄話 (902 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 18:23:46

回複:回複:More advice? Worthit, Xiaobaitu, and other experts.. -kinan- 給 kinan 發送悄悄話 (57 bytes) () 09/22/2006 postreply 19:24:45

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”