回複:Ok--Two points

First, If the chinese attorney help him do the illegal paperwork on the purpose, he/she would lose his/her licence and also he/she could not charge only $3000 for 140 and 485 both for illegal person who apply GC, he could definitely charge more than that. The immigration officer is not so stupid not to check applicant record.

-- I140/I485 filed for EB1 (although the guy is BS holder) is not illegal. Everybody could file EB1. The apps may not be qualified, but they are legal. It is also legal to file GC apps on behalf of illegal immigrants. Yes, the officers do check the qualification, but it does take time to process. I cannot see any problem solely based on the story told.


Second, Nobody would like to pay $ 30,000 to get a job which kill chicken, if your story said he got $30,000 per year kill-chicken job, it would be more reasonable.
-- if $30k + chick-killer job for a GC, that is reasonable.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:Ok--Two points -Gongdao1- 給 Gongdao1 發送悄悄話 (74 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:54:21

In stupid people's mind, everyone else is stupid. -lkenlken- 給 lkenlken 發送悄悄話 (27 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:56:34

Other stupid guy speaking out -Gongdao1- 給 Gongdao1 發送悄悄話 (38 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:58:07

回複:回複:回複:Ok--Two points -balsam_pear_k- 給 balsam_pear_k 發送悄悄話 (186 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:57:44

my last statement -Gongdao1- 給 Gongdao1 發送悄悄話 (208 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:04:31

回複:my last statement -balsam_pear_k- 給 balsam_pear_k 發送悄悄話 (131 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:11:20

Ok, other last statement -Gongdao1- 給 Gongdao1 發送悄悄話 (86 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:17:34

官僚主義和腐敗完全是兩回事 -xiaobaitu- 給 xiaobaitu 發送悄悄話 xiaobaitu 的博客首頁 (800 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:04:23

回複:官僚主義和腐敗完全是兩回事 -balsam_pear_k- 給 balsam_pear_k 發送悄悄話 (60 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:06:36

回複:官僚主義和腐敗完全是兩回事 -balsam_pear_k- 給 balsam_pear_k 發送悄悄話 (60 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:07:08

對中國人的嚴苛和對別國人的寬容 -mythoughtsa- 給 mythoughtsa 發送悄悄話 (106 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:25:53

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!