回複:there is no 100% for anything. Contingency happens

來源: pr 2006-08-31 10:52:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (264 bytes)
回答: 回複:mytwocents/howdy/xiaobaitu, please!pr2006-08-31 10:31:05
Yes, I can not say it is 100%. What I mean is that with 245(a)/(k), overystaying and w/o work permit should not be an issue as long as it is less 180 days. But why it is still case by case, and there is chance that AOS could be denied because of those two reasons?

所有跟帖: 

No body can guarantee that a officer must not deny you -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (184 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:42:59

what is MTR? -pr- 給 pr 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:46:29

Motion to reopen or motion to reconsideration -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:48:50

245(k) is not a case by case issue. -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 12:04:06

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”