You should be OK under 245(k). You meet the requirement

來源: mytwocents 2006-08-31 07:22:08 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (108 bytes)
when in the narrowest intepretion of the law. You just defauly take 245(k) benefit. Do not need to declare.

所有跟帖: 

Agree with 2cents. Bring 245(k)up if problem incurred -howdy- 給 howdy 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 07:27:39

I believe that someone is happy to see a deny and then -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (49 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 07:48:20

But his/her case is too straightfoward to be denied. -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 07:53:03

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”