請前輩們幫忙: EB1a 140 RFE (VSC to NSC)

來源: 140Pending 2006-08-21 13:29:32 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1468 bytes)
要求補充下麵幾條:

The evidence, as initially ted, is insufficient to warrant approval.

Evidence of the following types might be particularly helpful:

1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;

這一條我已經準備了獎勵條例的中文文件並且翻譯了其中一部分。

2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;

有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants,準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究,讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用?

3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.

這一條沒有直接的證據,但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道,我是其中一個子課題主持人,報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎?

另外我滿足了其他幾條:比如是多個雜誌的審稿人,研究成果的原創性(原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信)。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據?需要更多推薦信嗎?

詢問律師RFE的工作方案,律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽,跟什麽都沒有說一樣。

請位前輩幫忙,多謝了。

所有跟帖: 

Basically, get more reference letters and other -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (76 bytes) () 08/21/2006 postreply 14:20:49

回複:請前輩們幫忙: EB1a 140 RFE (VSC to NSC) -extraordinary- 給 extraordinary 發送悄悄話 (1022 bytes) () 08/21/2006 postreply 16:22:33

回複:請前輩們幫忙: EB1a 140 RFE (VSC to NSC) -cdc7- 給 cdc7 發送悄悄話 (199 bytes) () 08/21/2006 postreply 17:06:42

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”