請教：EB1a 140 RFE (VSC t o NSC )

要求補充下麵幾條：

The evidence, as initially ted, is insufficient to warrant approval.

Evidence of the following types might be particularly helpful:

1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;

這一條我已經準備了獎勵條例的中文間並且翻譯了其中一部分。

2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;

有一個美國的和幾個中國的Grants，準備了。

3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.

這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？

另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據？在找推薦信有用嗎？

詢問律師RFE的工作方案，律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽，跟什麽都沒有說一樣。

請位前輩幫忙，多謝了。