re)

XXXXIt is a good sign that the VO sais that you are almost qualified.

There several ways to judge you and your work: 1. you said that you are good. 2. Other people said that you are good (recommendation letters), 3. your work says that your good.

The documentation ted with the petition indicates you are an accomplished researcher and the importance of the research described is not in question, however, it is not apparent from the evidence that you have the level of acclaim required for the visa classification.

You ted evidence that you are a member of several associations. Among these, the ACS (American chemical society) required only that a member have a degree in chemical science, be certified as a teacher in chemical science, be certified as a teacher in chemical science, or have relevant work experience. Provide evidence that your memberships are in associations in your field that require outstanding achievements as judged by experts in your field.

Provide evidence that you have received prizes for your work as a researcher after your studies were completed. You ted evidence that you received two awards that were given to you as a result of your work as a student.

XXXXX Indicating that you are a key person of a NIH grants (grant informations)

Provide evidence that you performed a leading role in an organization with a distinguished reputation. Also provide evidence that your research has made a major breakthrough. Such evidence may include journals written about your research and the impact your research has had on your field, and that you research methods have been adopted by other scientists to further your work. You may also evidence that your work has been patented, and that your patent has led to new manufacturing processes or a new product as a result of your work.

XXX Citations, More recommendation letters from NIH and other institution big guys.


please any avialable additonal evidence for the 10 criteria Listed in the EB11.......這裏輸入你要的文字

It seems that VO read some of my petition letter, but definetely he reads very fast. Is the question about the ACS membership tricky? I had 15 peer-reviewd papers and numerous presentations in international conferences like ACS, but how to answer this question?

XXXXXXHow important are the journals in which you published your manus? How important are your publications?

I work as a postdoc for a NIH project and did not get important awards in 2 years even thouth published 3 papers, how to handle the question about "show your prizes for your work as a researcher after your studies were completed"?

Your suggestions are highly appreciated.