the letter asks me to provide evidence:

來源: zorro2 2006-07-25 16:08:42 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (472 bytes)
回答: 485 REF helpzorro22006-07-25 14:38:16
"the new permanent position is in the same or similar occupational classification as the original employment.

The letter must be in the original and signed by an executive or officer of the organization who is authorized to make or confirm an offer of permanent employment."

I do not think they made mistake because at the beginning of the letter, they says my case is NIW.

So they are suck!!

Anyone had samilar trouble?

Thanks

所有跟帖: 

回複:NIW是不要求permanent position,不信你查查,不會到 -radiology- 給 radiology 發送悄悄話 (14 bytes) () 07/25/2006 postreply 16:13:24

I knew! that is why I asked help to see someone -zorro2- 給 zorro2 發送悄悄話 (31 bytes) () 07/25/2006 postreply 16:49:25

回複:為了不耽誤你的事,打電話去CIS去確證一下 -radiology- 給 radiology 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/25/2006 postreply 16:59:36

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”