回複：EB1

Thanks. After 3 months waiting, I received a letter from USCIS (Request for Evidence) about my EB-1 petition (Extraordinary ability). This is the first letter I received from USCIS. It seems they did not read any documents I sent to them, is that possible? Since they just repeat what they said in the website, like:

Please submit any three or more of the following:

1. Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence;
2. Membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members;
3. Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media;
4. Evidence that the alien has judged the work of others, either individually or on a panel;
5. Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field;
6. Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media;
7. Evidence that the alien's work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases;
8. Performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations;
9. Evidence that the alien commands a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field;
10. Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts.
And :

In order to qualify for this classification, the petitioner must clearly show that he or she meets the very high standard of this classification. …What distinguishes the beneficiary from others who have the beneficiary’s training and background?…

You must submit the requested information within 12 weeks…

There is nothing talk about my case.

How to orgnize the documents? should I talk a lot about my peer-reviewer? recommendation letter?
thanks

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：EB1 -丫丫和想想- ♀ (212 bytes) () 07/07/2006 postreply 22:52:49

• 回複：回複：EB1 -ds008- ♂ (876 bytes) () 07/08/2006 postreply 01:38:43

• 回複：回複：回複：EB1 -extraordinary- ♂ (37 bytes) () 07/08/2006 postreply 12:32:55