回複:NIW, RFE--我對這兩個問題的理解正確嗎?

來源: WorthIt 2006-06-19 12:03:24 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (607 bytes)
Not exactly.

1) should address if your study is based on the need of USA, not just based on your own interest, that is why USA needs such study.

2): equivalent to two questions, 1) if effect of your work/study is in national scope, 2)what are effects/influences of your work on national interest etc?

It seems that your original petition letter did not well address the three prongs of NIW.

You need to talk to your lawyer about your RFE. You would fail your RFE if you answered your RFE based on your such understanding.

Just for your reference

yjy_wang@yahoo.com

所有跟帖: 

回複:你賣的爛材料太把偶的一個哥們坑苦了! -WorthIt- 給 WorthIt 發送悄悄話 (576 bytes) () 06/20/2006 postreply 08:27:54

回複:WorthIt 你賣的爛材料把偶的一個哥們坑苦了! -WorthIt- 給 WorthIt 發送悄悄話 (581 bytes) () 06/20/2006 postreply 08:30:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”