討論討論H1B期間創業和485期間通過創業保持身份
大家都一起來討論討論可行性和可能的問題吧:
1. H1B期間創業(485未交): 我的理解是可以注冊公司, 可以雇人, 但自己不能從公司領工資, 因為你的工作許可隻能為現在公司(H1B Sponsor)工作的. 也就是說, 你擁有公司的利潤不能轉化為你個人的收入.
2. 140批準, 485上交180天: 根據2005年5月的Yates Memo, 485上交180天後可以換工作包括self-employment, 隻要1. 原來的140意圖是真實的, 2. 工作是"same or similiar" occupation 3. Self employment是真實的.
我的理解是, 比如你的LC是程序員, 你可以在失業後開一家專門開發IT項目的公司以保持身份. 搞研究的, 也可以開一家公司拉研究項目, 但必須和140上的職業same or similiar. 因為是自己的公司, 在這一點上就靈活多了.
如果你開了一年, 就拉了一兩萬美元的項目, 甚至更少或者沒有. 我不知道會怎麽處理, 我覺得關鍵是證實該self-employment是真實的, 比如你有很多開展業務的活動等等. 美國法律就鼓勵創業, 創業頭兩年收入少也算正常吧. 你的140已經批準, 根據Yates Memo新公司不必證明ability to pay.
原memo: http://www.immigration.com/newsletter1/newac21guidance.pdf
相關聯結: http://www.murthy.com/news/n_yatmem.html
下麵是Yates Memo原文, 大家說說這條路子可行嗎?
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA § 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
大家都一起來討論討論可行性和可能的問題吧:
1. H1B期間創業(485未交): 我的理解是可以注冊公司, 可以雇人, 但自己不能從公司領工資, 因為你的工作許可隻能為現在公司(H1B Sponsor)工作的. 也就是說, 你擁有公司的利潤不能轉化為你個人的收入.
2. 140批準, 485上交180天: 根據2005年5月的Yates Memo, 485上交180天後可以換工作包括self-employment, 隻要1. 原來的140意圖是真實的, 2. 工作是"same or similiar" occupation 3. Self employment是真實的.
我的理解是, 比如你的LC是程序員, 你可以在失業後開一家專門開發IT項目的公司以保持身份. 搞研究的, 也可以開一家公司拉研究項目, 但必須和140上的職業same or similiar. 因為是自己的公司, 在這一點上就靈活多了.
如果你開了一年, 就拉了一兩萬美元的項目, 甚至更少或者沒有. 我不知道會怎麽處理, 我覺得關鍵是證實該self-employment是真實的, 比如你有很多開展業務的活動等等. 美國法律就鼓勵創業, 創業頭兩年收入少也算正常吧. 你的140已經批準, 根據Yates Memo新公司不必證明ability to pay.
原memo: http://www.immigration.com/newsletter1/newac21guidance.pdf
相關聯結: http://www.murthy.com/news/n_yatmem.html
下麵是Yates Memo原文, 大家說說這條路子可行嗎?
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA § 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
