請教專家, 剛通過的移民法中5年非法移民到底是怎麽定義的呢?

請教專家, 剛通過的移民法中5年非法移民到底是怎麽定義的呢?
如果說6年前到美國, 2年前才非法(這是可能的, 比如說讀完書後沒找到工作),這算不算非法5年呢?是不是不論來多久, 即使來了10年,也一定要有5年是非法的呢? 我有很多同學(包括我自己)都覺很冤,學費,律師費花了不少不說,身份讓人這個煩就更不用提了.現在找的工作薪水太低,勉強有了hib,綠卡是沒希望的.我要是現在黑掉 (來7年) ,符合5年條款嗎?謝謝.

所有跟帖： 

• You could say "I made some money outside campus 5 years ago" -eeeyeee- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:06:46

• Thank you for replying, but how can you prove that? -111012- ♀ (197 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:17:17

• If you got a car accident 5 years ago. That is a strong evidence -cth163- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:20:08

• Thank you, but why car accident is a prove? -111012- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:30:59

• Because your name is on the report and they know you were here 5 -cth163- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:33:07

• years ago. That is the prove. -cth163- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:33:56

• Thank you, but how that report can prove i am illegl here? -111012- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:47:13

• No document = Illegal. -cth163- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 11:37:12

• They have records if you are legal. If no, illegal. -cth163- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 11:38:45

• Folks, calm down. There is nothing in effect before -einmaliger- ♂ (125 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:07:31

• 嚴重同意. 別拿那些參院, 眾院單邊的所謂法案來蠱惑人心. -cth163- ♂ (41 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:18:34

• 謝謝.我也覺的是.今天一個說法明天一個說法,讓人心煩.我隻是很迷惑關 -111012- ♀ (80 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:44:42

• 回複：怎麽象我在歐洲時見到的人們"找"大赦條件 -radiology- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 08:48:03

• 剛通過的移民法中5年非法移民到底是怎麽定義的呢? -beijinggirl- ♀ (31 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 18:28:00