485PENDING想換工作的，請細讀AC21條例

U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
HQBCIS 70/6.2.8 - P
425 I Street NW
Washington, DC 20536
August 4, 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS, BCIS
REGIONAL DIRECTORS, BCIS
FROM: William R. Yates /s/ Janis Sposato
Acting Associate Director for Operations
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
Department of Homeland Security

SUBJECT: Continuing Validity of Form I-140 Petition in accordance with Section 106(c) of
the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21)
(AD03-16)

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide field offices with guidance on processing
Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, when the beneficiary
of an approved Form I-140, Petition for Immigrant Worker, is eligible to change employers
under §106(c) of AC21.

On January 29, 2001, the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (Service)
Office of Field Operations issued a memorandum entitled “Interim Guidance for Processing
H-1B Applications for Admission as Affected by the American Competitiveness in the
Twenty-First Century Act of 2002, Public Law 106-313.” On June 19, 2001, the Office of
Programs issued a follow-up memorandum entitled “Initial Guidance for Processing H-1B
Petitions as Affected by the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (Public
Law 106-313) and Related Legislation (Public Law 106-311) and (Public Law 106-396).” On
February 28, 2003, Immigration Services Division issued a memorandum entitled “Procedures
for concurrently filed family-based or employment-based Form I-485 when the underlying visa
petition is denied.” These memoranda remain in effect. On July 31, 2002, the Service published
an interim rule allowing, in certain circumstances, the concurrent filing of Form I-140 and Form
I-485. Previous Service regulations required an alien worker to first obtain approval of the
underlying Form I-140 before applying for permanent resident status on the Form I-485.
Institution of the concurrent filing process, and other issues relating to revocation of approval of
Form I-140 petitions, have resulted in questions on how to process adjustment applications when
the alien beneficiary claims eligibility benefits under §106(c) of AC21 due to a change in his or
her employment.


A. Approved Form I-140 Visa Petitions and Form I-485 Applications
The AC21 §106(c) states:
A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D) [since re-designated section 204(a)(1)(F) of the
Act] for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 245
has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more shall remain valid with
respect to a new job if the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the
same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.
Accordingly, guidance in the June 19, 2001, memorandum provides that the labor
certification or approval of a Form I-140 employment-based (EB) immigrant petition shall
remain valid when an alien changes jobs, if:
(a) A Form I-485, Application to Adjust Status, on the basis of the EB
immigrant petition has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180
days or more; and
(b) The new job is in the same or similar occupational classification as the job
for which the certification or approval was initially made.
This policy is still in effect and has not changed as a result of implementation of the
concurrent filing process.
If the Form I-140 (“immigrant petition”) has been approved and the Form I-485
(“adjustment application”) has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more (as
measured from the Form I-485 receipt date), the approved Form I-140 will remain valid even if
the alien changes jobs or employers as long as the new offer of employment is in the same or
similar occupation.1 If the Form I-485 has been pending for less than 180 days, then the
approved Form I-140 shall not remain valid with respect to a new offer of employment.


B. Provisions in Cases of Revocation of the Approved Form I-140
1AC21 also provides that any underlying labor certification also remains valid if the
conditions of §106(c) are satisfied.
As discussed above, if an alien is the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 and is also
the beneficiary of a Form I-485 that has been pending 180 days or longer, then the approved
Form I-140 remains valid with respect to a new offer of employment under the flexibility
provisions of §106(c) of AC21.
Accordingly, if the employer withdraws the approved Form I-140 on or after the date that
the Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 shall remain valid under
the provisions of §106(c) of AC21. It is expected that the alien will have submitted evidence to
the office having jurisdiction over the pending Form I-485 that the new offer of employment is
in the same or similar occupational classification as the offer of employment for which the
petition was filed. Accordingly, if the underlying approved Form I-140 is withdrawn, and the
alien has not submitted evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment, the adjudicating
officer must issue a Notice of Intent to Deny the pending Form I-485. See 8 CFR
103.2(b)(16)(i). If the evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment submitted in response
to the Notice of Intent to Deny is timely filed and it appears that the alien has a new offer of
employment in the same or similar occupation, the BCIS may consider the approved Form I-140
to remain valid with respect to the new offer of employment and may continue regular
processing of the Form I-485. If the applicant responds to the Notice of Intent to Deny, but has
not established that the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupation, the
adjudicating officer may immediately deny the Form I-485. If the alien does not respond or fails
to timely respond to the Notice of Intent to Deny, the adjudicating officer may immediately deny
the Form I-485.
If approval of the Form I-140 is revoked or the Form I-140 is withdrawn before the
alien’s Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 is no longer valid with
respect to a new offer of employment and the Form I-485 may be denied. If at any time the
BCIS revokes approval of the Form I-140 based on fraud, the alien will not be eligible for the
job flexibility provisions of §106(c) of AC21 and the adjudicating officer may, in his or her
discretion, deny the attached Form I-485 immediately. In all cases an offer of employment must
have been bona fide, and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the Form I-140 was
approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. It should be noted that there is no
requirement in statute or regulations that a beneficiary of a Form I-140 actually be in the
underlying employment until permanent residence is authorized. Therefore, it is possible for an
alien to qualify for the provisions of §106(c) of AC21 even if he or she has never been employed
by the prior petitioning employer or the subsequent employer under section 204(j) of the Act.
Questions regarding this memorandum may be directed via e-mail through appropriate
channels to Joe Holliday at Service Center Operations or to Mari Johnson in Program and
Regulation Development.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE: I am a Volunteer Moderator. I only post my opinions.

所有跟帖： 

• This memo is superceded by the famous Yates memo, -mytwocents- ♂ (28 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:32:31

• are there any major difference? thanks! -lovatt- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:33:55

• Yates memo is much clear regarding the consequece of -mytwocents- ♂ (43 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:37:40

• I C. Thanks so much! -Lovatt- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:38:36

• Sorry, should say that further clarified by Yates memo -mytwocents- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:35:58

• Hey, one more question for you. -Lovatt- ♀ (275 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:41:21

• 回複：Hey, one more question for you. -mytwocents- ♂ (253 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:44:55

• thanks. I will still have the same kind of job -Lovatt- ♀ (138 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 14:54:21

• Yes. And AR-11 to comply with the law -mytwocents- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 15:01:26

• you are so helpful! wish you all the best! -Lovatt- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 15:04:32

• a question!!! Please help. -jameswang11111111- ♂ (463 bytes) () 05/03/2006 postreply 21:08:51

• 回複：a question!!! Please help. -mytwocents- ♂ (213 bytes) () 05/04/2006 postreply 08:20:49