To Xiaobaitu - Re: your response to Sunshine_r

Dear Xiaobaitu: according to your response to Sunshine_r, a divorce certificate from China is invalid if both parties are in the US even though they got married in China and both are Chinese citizen. Could you please provide the orignal citation of the US divorce law or the resource at where we can check? I don't quite understand. Both US and China should respect the court's decision in either country. Thanks a lot!

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：To Xiaobaitu - Re: your response to Sunshine_r -xiaobaitu- ♀ (278 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:06:56

• 那兩人都在US的該怎麽離才算呢？ -xiaoha- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:10:25

• 經過美國家事法院法官判決,that's so -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:20:03

• 我有點疑問, 隻要洲法HONOR這樣的離婚, 移民法也會的. -亂講- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:19:29

• 那樣要看移民官或移民法官如何認為，在移民問題上隻有聯邦機構有權決 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:22:37

• 但在婚姻法上, 移民法廳並沒有什麽權力. -亂講- ♂ (72 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:29:24

• 看,出現不同意見了吧?聽誰的? -無意得罪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:38:37

• 本壇的宗旨就是自由爭論. 沒必要驗明正身. -亂講- ♂ (81 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:32:43

• 不說了,互聯網本身就是虛擬的.得罪了. -無意得罪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:42:22

• 以前有實際判例是如此，當事人可以提出抗辯，但我看不出有什麽正當理 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:42:24

• 由在兩個人都在美國的情況下要在中國離婚 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:43:29

• 很多理由,至少可以省錢. -亂講- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:46:41

• 美國家事法院自己達成協議並入表不要花很多錢,特別是沒有財產和子女 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:53:12

• 爭議的情況下 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:53:47

• 當時人不懂如何離婚, 找律師要不要花錢. -亂講- ♂ (73 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 15:04:01