回複:TO Xiaobaitu, mytwocents, worth it, and other experts: Hel

來源: fsa2000 2006-03-01 16:34:21 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1600 bytes)
My questions are:
1. How can I prove that I will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications ? In my recommendation letters, ererybody has mentioned this point. Can I get more independent letter to providefurther evidence ?

Letters are NOT enough! You need some objective evidence. This is especially true in NSC.

2.You must establish you have a past record of specific prior achievement that justifies projections of future benefit to the national interest. You must establish, in some capacity,your ability to serve the national interest TO A SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER DEGREE THAN THE MAJORITY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES.

In my application I have showed that I have 7 first author paper, including on paper has inpact fact over 18. I also have the journal's senior science editor's prove letter. What can I do ? My another paper is accepted recently (Impact fact 6.5), should I add it in my RFE response ?

Comparison, comparison, comparison! You need to focus this point in your evidence.

3.Regarding the grant, it is easy to get copies with my name on it. But what if my name was not on the grant, I am the person who actually participated the research ?

Get the boss' letter to prove your contribution, or some other hard evidence.

4. Regarding the citation, I have included them in my original application, what can I do?

If they ask, just prepare and submit again.

For more information, you could drop me an email at; fsa2000@gmail.com
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”