Because the EB1 require at least three citerions, in your case, you can explain your original contribution in science, based on your publications; showing authorship 20 papers; showing your citation. you have meet three citerions. The key question is how to orginize your supporting evidence and express a strong petition. generally, EB1 is more concrete and objective. The NIW sounds easier, but subjective. in particular, you need write is perfect petition expaining why your work is interest in national level. Defenitely, you are a very strong applicant.
回複:回複:回複:回複:Is my case eligible to NIW
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Is my case eligible to NIW -128181- ♀ (24 bytes) () 01/03/2006 postreply 16:01:51
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Is my case eligible to NIW -GC- ♂ (84 bytes) () 01/03/2006 postreply 16:10:06
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Is my case eligible to -musella- ♂ (63 bytes) () 01/03/2006 postreply 17:06:52