sure you can try both

來源: 198151 2005-12-28 16:18:03 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (920 bytes)
回答: I will still choose NIW for you1981512005-12-28 14:57:15
For EB-1, no matter OR or extraordinary ability, it is better you have a permanant position. I have seen quite some cases got RFE asking for this. Even one case for NIW, which is outragous.

You can use same letters for both category. But, if possible, try to make two slightly different letters, one for each purpose. Only the ending words are slightly different. Well, this is not a critical point.

You have a very strong backgound, but lots of cases like yours got RFE or even dinied, because people thought their case was so strong, they did not prepre as careful, say like a normal guy, including me.

So spend 2-3 months, got good letters, dig out any good piece of evidence: citation, good comments, etc, and write a very nice and clear petition letter. Even if you hire a lawyer, do 90% of your homework, they can help, but they don't care for each case, you care.

Good luck

所有跟帖: 

thank you very much and happy new year! -tobewithyou- 給 tobewithyou 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/28/2005 postreply 20:27:05

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”