some explaination

來源: lovewind 2005-11-25 19:49:24 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (5533 bytes)
回答: my 2 centslovewind2005-11-25 00:07:36
Q: Submit further evidence to persuasively establish that the national interest would be adversely affected if an employer were required to obtain labor certification from ....

A: You can demonstrate the point by saying:
1. present and future project need you to collaborate extensively with someone outside your research institute. Therefore, LC, which require one fixed employer, can't be applied to you.
2. You need to get GC quickk due to the necessarity of traveling abroad.
3. It is impossible to quantify your research work due to the uniqueness of your research ability.
4. You can't work for some very important project due to the restriction of employment which require GC.

**************************************************
I do not think these are the best points to argue, especially 1 and 3=2. There are some other better arguments.
**************************************************
Expalaination: That is the points in my lawyer's coverletter template. I used that for my own and it was approved. My lawyer used that for his clients and most of cases got approved. But there might be some other better argument that I am not aware of. If you know, please let this guy know.

Also, I want to mention that you need to demonstrate all these points with strong recommendation letter. For example, you can write in one letter saying due to your visa statue, you can't visit someone's lab oversea. And in your boss's letter, you can say that you have collaborated extensively with the experts in this area and it is important for you to be able to switch your employlment.

Remeber, you have to prove the points that you claim with some solid evidence, such as recommendation letters.

Q: Submit further documentation that shows the beneficiary's skills as being unique and innovative and of genuine service to the national interest of the United State. Does the beneficiary possess any special skills, .....
A: You need to establish this point with strong independent recommendation letters, saying you are well beyond anyone else in the field and without you, there is going to be a big vacuum in this field, etc.

****************************************************
Independent letters + objective evidence (expecially specific numbers)
****************************************************
Explaination: objective evidence is very important. But it is hard to get new evidence within 1 month. therefore independent letters will be very important. I only submitted independent letters in my ITD. I can't find anything else. So in the response, in addition to reorganize your older info, pay a lot of attention to your new evidence.

Q: In support of meeting the third prong you have submitted numerous reference letters. In the reference letter ... " ..." however, this letter has failed to show how your research as already been used in academic and commercial...

A: Get some professor (independent) saying that your reseach finding could be applied to their present research work. Be spcific.
Get letters from industry saying that your finding has high indurstrial potential, or is being applied to industry.

****************************************************
The officer does not like the words such as "could" or "may". You need to emphzsize that you "have already" influenced others and impacted the research field.
*****************************************************
Expliaination: That is very true and important. Your letters need to be in strong suport of you. Be authoratitaive, instead of half-hearted.

Q: All of the above letters are from the petitioner's immediate circle of colleagues, mentors, and collaborates. ....
It would be expected that an individual that has influenced the field would have extensive citation record. .... please submit evidence of the extensive citation....

A: Explain due to the time of your publication, it is hard to get extensive citation. However, due to the importance of your work, you get e-mail request directly from someone who never know you (fake some) and provide a list of people who are interested in your research work.

Q: Please submit evidence from independent researchers stating to the beneificiary contributions and the impact on the field.....

A: again, more independent recommendation letters. 5 should be enough.

******************************************************
3-5 well-written independent letters

Explaination: I think that is very important to get well-written independent letters. The number is less important than the quality. Also make sure these referees are going to write whatever you want to put in. Some might feel uncomfortable saying something. I had one referee who deleted most of the draft that I prepared for him. So his letter is not of too much use to me although he is a professor in Harvard University. I focus more on other letters from someone else who support me without reservation.

For a good recommendation writing, check out these posters:
http://immigration.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=fyy&MsgID=608
and
http://immigration.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=fyy&MsgID=594

I don't know Mr. Fan but I think the points there are good.

I tried my best to help. But I am not professional and it is just from my recent experience. So the information might be incomplete.

Best wishes


所有跟帖: 

You have gave me a big help!回複:some explaination -echoman- 給 echoman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/25/2005 postreply 20:08:09

you are surely welcome! I am glad to help -lovewind- 給 lovewind 發送悄悄話 (361 bytes) () 11/25/2005 postreply 20:39:11

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”