response to NIW RFE

I got RFE for the 3rd prong, it asked for three things:
1. independent letters to show influence of my work
2. extensive citations of my work
3. review large number of articles for many Journals.

in the response, should I do it point-by-point? my problem is that I don't have the 2nd and 3rd, but I do have other subjective evidence like work reported by media, cited by gorvenmental document.

Thanks for your suggestions.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：response to NIW RFE -65151- ♀ (26 bytes) () 11/11/2005 postreply 20:06:18

• TSC #362 -6842- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/11/2005 postreply 20:32:33

• 回複：TSC #362 -17039- ♀ (95 bytes) () 11/11/2005 postreply 20:41:13

• no standard, u do your best -hahahahawo- ♂ (38 bytes) () 11/12/2005 postreply 07:13:33

• 回複：response to NIW RFE -fsa2000- ♀ (117 bytes) () 11/12/2005 postreply 15:36:13

• 回複：response to NIW RFE -F1_485- ♀ (247 bytes) () 11/12/2005 postreply 23:29:10