This isn't concurrent filling.

來源: xiefeng 2005-08-24 13:09:44 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (245 bytes)
This is tradictional way. It is the most safy way but need longer time. If you have extremly strong background, you'd better concurrent filling.It saves time. If your lawyer thinks you are not strong enough, it is better to go step by step.

所有跟帖: 

This is not traditional way. -immigrate- 給 immigrate 發送悄悄話 (224 bytes) () 08/24/2005 postreply 13:30:33

You are wrong, This is -Concurrent- 給 Concurrent 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2005 postreply 15:54:16

我的律師也這麽說的 -新規定不同以前- 給 新規定不同以前 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2005 postreply 17:52:01

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”