上麵的貼子重新整理了一下

RD: 05/16/2005
I-140 RFE: 07/06/2005

RFE 總共有兩頁。Three－Prong滿足了前兩項，第三項要不證據。原文如下：

*****************************************************************
Third, it must be established that alien will serve the national interest to *a substantial greater degree* than would an available
U.S. worker having the same minimum qualification. This third
prong has not been adequately documented.

Although you have demonstrated success in your field, the
documentation falls short of establishing that you have a record
of achievement making you so uniquely qualified as to forego the
labor certification process in order to allow you to continue to
work. The letters written on your behalf, although they speak of
and to your accomplishments, your skill, and you dedication, do
not adequately establish the overall impact of your specific work
on the field. It is also not clear how your level of
accomplishment compares to the accomplishments of other successful scientists in your field. Although it appears your work
contributes to the body of knowledge in the field, the type of
research progress discussed would not from a layman’s
comprehension appear to constitute the level of breakthrough that
would qualitify you for the benefit being sought. It is not clear
that the results of your research have been widely implemented
across your field.
……
1. Submit evidence related to your ability to perform the duties
of the proposed employment position. To be considered in the
national interest you must make a showing significantly above
that necessary to prove the “prospective national benefit”
required of all aliens seeking to qualify as “exceptional”.
Exceptional is defined under Service regulation as …”a degree
of expertise significantly above that ordinary encountered in
the sciences, arts, or business.”

2. You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest
would be adversely affected if a labor certification were
required. You must demonstrate that it would be contrary to
the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective
employer of your services by making available to US workers
the position you seek.

3. You must establish you are not seeking a national interest
waiver based on a shortage of qualified workers in a given
field, regardless of the nature of the occupation. The
national interest waiver is not warranted solely for the
purpose of ameliorating a local labor shortage.

4. Again, you must establish you have a past record of
specific prior achievement that justifies projections of
future benefit to the national interest. You
must establish, in some capacity, your ability to serve
the national interest TO A SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER DEGREE
THAN THE MAJORITY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES WHO ARE ALSO PRODUCTIVE
AND SUCCESSFUL. You must demonstrate to some degree you
influence on your field of employment as a whole.
****************************************************************

請問，如何回答這些問題呢？什麽新的證據會比較有利呢？謝謝各位，
真的急死了，9月中旬是最後的期限。

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：上麵的貼子重新整理了一下 -WorthIt- ♀ (405 bytes) () 07/12/2005 postreply 06:59:39

• 是不是拿幾封額外的推薦信，就可以了呢？ -還有什麽其他的可以用- ♀ (59 bytes) () 07/12/2005 postreply 07:17:20

• 回複：是不是拿幾封額外的推薦信，就可以了呢？ -WorthIt- ♀ (709 bytes) () 07/12/2005 postreply 09:10:54