why 350 fewer?

本帖於 2026-03-11 17:03:18 時間, 由普通用戶 internuts 編輯
回答: 美軍傷亡約150人。Civ62026-03-11 16:16:48

reuters hates trump who cut off their ngo bloodlines.   reuters would take any chances and with any power in their control, news/information, to stab on trump's back.  where did reuters get the source of 150 dead?  well, "two people familiar with the matter".  ok, i got it, not from the us press conferences/war dept briefings, and the president, but from where?  iran!

but we heard the iran's announcement to the world in the begining of the war - 3/4/2026 - the us had 500 deaths https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iran-s-top-security-official-claims-500-us-military-deaths-calls-it-unjust-war-on-iran/3850281.  were it true?  why it were 350 people fewer this time?

you be the judge.

 

 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

不見棺材不落淚,看看裏麵白宮發言人的視頻。 -Civ6- 給 Civ6 發送悄悄話 (235 bytes) () 03/11/2026 postreply 17:04:27

i don't spend a dime on dailybeast trick me to subscribe it? -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2026 postreply 18:35:49

不撞南牆不回頭,看看這 13:20 -Civ6- 給 Civ6 發送悄悄話 (228 bytes) () 03/11/2026 postreply 21:29:31

在醫院裏死的不算 -arrowheads- 給 arrowheads 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2026 postreply 17:08:15

i thought you blacklisted me. removed it? i'll remove you -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (12 bytes) () 03/11/2026 postreply 18:44:59

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!