你很明顯沒看文本,隻看不完全的摘要。文本講得很清楚要加強在西太平洋第一島鏈的軍事力量:

 

"A favorable conventional military balance remains an essential component of

strategic competition. There is, rightly, much focus on Taiwan, partly because of

Taiwan’s dominance of semiconductor production, but mostly because Taiwan

provides direct access to the Second Island Chain and splits Northeast and

Southeast Asia into two distinct theaters. Given that one-third of global shipping

passes annually through the South China Sea, this has major implications for the

U.S. economy. Hence deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving

military overmatch, is a priority. We will also maintain our longstanding

declaratory policy on Taiwan, meaning that the United States does not support any

unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.


We will build a military capable of denying aggression anywhere in the First Island

Chain. But the American military cannot, and should not have to, do this alone.

Our allies must step up and spend—and more importantly do—much more for

collective defense. America’s diplomatic efforts should focus on pressing our First

Island Chain allies and partners to allow the U.S. military greater access to their

ports and other facilities, to spend more on their own defense, and most

importantly to invest in capabilities aimed at deterring aggression. This will

interlink maritime security issues along the First Island Chain while reinforcing

U.S. and allies’ capacity to deny any attempt to seize Taiwan or achieve a balance

of forces so unfavorable to us as to make defending that island impossible."

 

所有跟帖: 

矛盾嗎? -波段王- 給 波段王 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 15:23:26

Indo-Pacific remains important but second-tier -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (629 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 15:30:20

讚。 講的很清楚 -波段王- 給 波段王 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 15:38:06

Only second to 西半球, 那個不需多大的美國軍事力量。 -曉筠- 給 曉筠 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 15:40:16

你這是別人的詮釋。你自己去看看原文。 -曉筠- 給 曉筠 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 15:42:45

別人?that's my understanding and I believe anyone who reads -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (97 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 16:19:21

Geopolitics is a part of my professional work, so I have to -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (66 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 16:20:48

Also, you’re clearly not a very effective leader. A real -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (179 bytes) () 12/05/2025 postreply 16:23:03

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!