如果國會通過提案,需要參院批準和總統簽字嗎?

Legislative Path for the Epstein Files Release Bill

The "bill" in question—formally the Epstein Files Transparency Act (introduced as H.R. 581 in July 2025)—is a standard legislative bill (not a simple House resolution) designed to compel the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publicly release all unclassified investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. This includes flight logs, travel records, names of referenced individuals/entities, internal DOJ communications, and records on any document destruction or concealment. If the House passes it via the ongoing discharge petition process (now at 218 signatures, forcing a floor vote likely next week), it must follow the full bicameral legislative process to become law and trigger the mandatory release. Here's a breakdown:

1. House Passage (Already in Motion)

  • The discharge petition, led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA), has secured the required 218 signatures (majority of the 435-member House). This bypasses committee approval and forces a floor vote, expected early December (accelerated to next week per Speaker Johnson's concession).
  • Passage requires a simple majority (218 votes). It's likely to succeed with full Democratic support (plus ~20-30 GOP rebels like Massie, Greene, Boebert, and Mace), despite opposition from leadership and Trump.

2. Senate Approval (Required)

  • Yes, Senate voting is necessary. The bill must pass the Senate in identical form (simple majority of 51 votes, assuming no filibuster).
  • Challenges: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has shown little interest, calling it unnecessary given the House Oversight Committee's ongoing probe (which has released ~50,000+ pages so far). Trump's opposition could pressure GOP senators, and the filibuster (60 votes needed to end debate) might block it unless waived via reconciliation (unlikely for this issue).
  • If passed, any Senate amendments would require a House-Senate conference committee to reconcile differences before final votes in both chambers.

3. Presidential Signature (Required)

  • Yes, Trump's signature is needed for the bill to become law and legally bind the DOJ to release the files.
  • Options: Trump could sign it, let it become law unsigned after 10 days (if Congress is in session), or veto it (requiring a two-thirds override in both chambers—unlikely with GOP majorities).
  • Trump's stance: He's actively lobbying against it, calling it a "Democratic hoax" and directing AG Pam Bondi to probe opponents instead. A veto is probable, stalling enforcement.

Key Alternatives and Realities

  • No Automatic Release on House Passage Alone: Unlike simple resolutions (H.Res., internal House matters) or concurrent resolutions (bicameral but non-binding), this is a bill with the force of law, so it can't bypass the Senate or President. House passage would be symbolic/political pressure but not legally compel DOJ action without full enactment.
  • Enforcement Options: If stalled, Congress could pursue contempt proceedings against DOJ officials (criminal referral or civil suit to enforce), but these are slow and rarely force compliance.
  • Current Momentum: The House Oversight Committee (bipartisan, subpoena-powered) continues releasing batches (e.g., 20,000+ pages on Nov. 13), providing partial transparency without new legislation. Full DOJ files remain withheld, fueling the push.
 
 
Stage Requirement Likelihood of Passage Key Hurdle
House Vote Simple majority (218) High (Dems + GOP rebels) Internal GOP pressure from Trump
Senate Vote Simple majority (51); 60 to end filibuster Low Thune's disinterest; filibuster
Presidential Action Signature (or 10-day inaction) Very Low Trump's veto threat
Override Veto (if needed) 2/3 in both chambers Near-Zero GOP loyalty to Trump
 

In summary, yes—Senate approval and Trump's signature (or override) are both essential for the files' compelled release. Without them, the effort remains a political flashpoint rather than a legal mandate, though it amplifies calls for voluntary DOJ disclosure amid the Oversight probe.

所有跟帖: 

Hard to achieve a veto proof. 但選民會問川普為什麽要veto,你不好奇嗎? -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:21:50

首先主黨參議員要舉手通過議案才有veto。 -bustout- 給 bustout 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:24:38

嗯,很多主黨都在名單上,那還不趕緊公布 -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:29:37

Obama Judge為啥block。 -bustout- 給 bustout 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:31:35

別瞎JB扯,我就問你現在支持公布所有epstein文件嗎,你以前可是發了不少epstein的貼 -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:34:54

俺啥時候反對公布文件? -bustout- 給 bustout 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:38:10

昨天也有一位。反川派的預設立場就是支持川普的一定反對文件公開。很搞笑 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:44:28

So you are also with MTG on this -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:54:09

So you are with MTG, I see -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:53:33

trump will do what he promised. why don't u question the ju -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (94 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:40:48

it is dem hoax. -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:24:00

如果veto則增加選民疑問,對26中選影響極大。不過沒啥可好奇的,不就是想說川心中有鬼麽? -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (102 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:34:19

嗯,你的好奇心隨川普,他讓你好奇你才好奇lol -小釘- 給 小釘 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:36:54

不就是說了ni想說的嗎?幹嘛好奇心那麽重? -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:42:59

one convenance is all of the records were created by dem -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (323 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:35:25

現在船鋪DOJ開始調查, 可以產生很多文件 -bustout- 給 bustout 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:39:32

righteously due -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/15/2025 postreply 10:42:44

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!