說我們什麽傲慢？還原罪？至少我們在自己國家傲慢原罪，有馬族整天傲慢中共祖國的作法就是每斷時間吃喝拉撒貢獻幹貨給他們祖國，然後還是呼嚕嚕移民到日本和我們這。sorry, 見一次替馬族中共祖國，大陸人民教川這堆見利忘義被背信棄義的跪族。
Good question — but no, Japan is fully capable of building aircraft carriers.
Japan doesn’t have traditional aircraft carriers mainly because of legal and political reasons, not technical limits. Here’s why:
- Constitutional restrictions:
After World War II, Japan adopted a pacifist constitution (Article 9), which renounces war and forbids maintaining “war potential.” For decades, this has been interpreted as banning offensive weapons — like full-scale aircraft carriers that can project power abroad. - Political framing:
Japan calls its navy “Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force” (JMSDF), emphasizing defense. So instead of “aircraft carriers,” it has “helicopter destroyers” (DDH) — large ships that can carry helicopters and, recently, short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) jets like the F-35B. - Reality today:
Japan actually is converting its Izumo-class helicopter destroyers into light aircraft carriers capable of operating F-35B fighters.- JS Izumo (DDH-183) and JS Kaga (DDH-184) are being modified with heat-resistant decks and other changes.
- Once finished, they will essentially be small aircraft carriers, similar in function to those used by the UK or Italy.
- Industrial capability:
Japan’s shipbuilding industry is extremely advanced — it can absolutely design and build a full-size carrier if it wanted to. The limitation is purely strategic and constitutional, not technical.
Would you like me to show what Japan’s Izumo-class carrier can currently do and how it compares to, say, a U.S. carrier?
