燒國旗是否屬於言論自由範疇?答案是YES!

Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. It is a highly controversial and emotional issue, but the court has affirmed that the government cannot suppress an idea simply because society finds it offensive. 

Key Supreme Court cases affirming flag burning as free speech:

Texas v. Johnson (1989): The court ruled 5–4 that the First Amendment protected Gregory Lee Johnson's right to burn a flag in protest of the Reagan administration. The majority opinion, written by Justice William Brennan, stated that the government could not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because it was offensive. This decision made flag-desecration laws in 48 states unconstitutional.

United States v. Eichman (1990): In response to the Johnson decision, Congress passed the Flag Protection Act. The Supreme Court struck down this federal law as unconstitutional, reaffirming its position that flag burning is protected expressive conduct. 

所有跟帖: 

yes but "It is a highly controversial and emotional issue" -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (319 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:08:32

which means it is insulting for a lot of people. -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:10:06

So? -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:11:10

so it means burning flag is protected by law but not means -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (30 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:16:30

It's THE law until it got overturned. -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:10:30

Yes it is the law but not sure if it is the right law. -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:13:47

A lot of them are controversial, eg. laws on abortion. -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:16:00

another case is about the 2nd amendment -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:18:47

the core is desecration, trump will fight for it. -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:33:35

it will go to scotus again and this time it'll be different -internuts- 給 internuts 發送悄悄話 internuts 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:35:45

So you want to take the law into your own hands? -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:18:57

No. Everyone should follow the law. -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:20:54

好。下次燒巴勒斯坦旗的時候就理直氣壯了。 -ahhhh- 給 ahhhh 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:09:48

善意提醒:可以燒巴勒斯坦旗,但絕對不要碰以色列旗 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:13:45

you communists are really good at stirring up trouble. 在美國燒以 -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (115 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:27:39

Gov will not stop or charge you from to do so. -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:14:12

Although flag burning is currently legal, I support banning -青雨紫煙- 給 青雨紫煙 發送悄悄話 青雨紫煙 的博客首頁 (39 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:14:00

what about the 5 star one? -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 Penuium 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:20:17

You are entitled to your opinions. -wwni60- 給 wwni60 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:20:24

讚LZ和MAGA們較真。MAGA們的謊言根本經不起較真。 -爬山看秋葉- 給 爬山看秋葉 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:36:01

讚樓主舉證說明。比光喊口號的強100倍不止。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (167 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 12:38:06

原來這裏不準喊口號? -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 Penuium 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:28:17

準啊。老兄不就擅長這個?隻是舉證,討論比喊口號強,沒說不準。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (167 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:30:44

這壇子除了口號還有什麽?發表論文? -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 Penuium 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:41:47

那就繼續喊。沒人攔著。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:48:07

還沒說妳盡是抄襲呢。也是個天朝培養的沒自己思想的人。。。 -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 Penuium 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:50:46

有思想的表現就是一口咬定川普的總統是老馬買來的。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (191 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 15:20:12

還有就是“抄襲”和注明的轉貼是完全兩回事。受過教育的應該知道 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 15:26:57

還有自嗨,臆想,段章取義, 歪曲事實... -ach06- 給 ach06 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/09/2025 postreply 13:55:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!