引子：一個普通的校友聚會
2025年6月的一個周六上午，陽光灑在加州帕薩迪納的一間社區中心裏。清華大學美國校友會（以下簡稱清華美校友會）計劃在這裏舉辦一場年度聚會，幾十個從美國各地趕來的校友們摩拳擦掌，期待重溫校園時光。然而，聚會還沒開始，氣氛就變得詭異起來。會長李明，一個50多歲的房地產開發商，皺著眉頭宣布：“今天的議程得改了，來自中國銀行（下文簡稱中行）的‘指導小組’發來了指示，講演嘉賓得換成他們推薦的人。”台下立刻炸開了鍋，有人低聲嘀咕：“這又是哪一出啊？咱們在美國開會，還得聽北京的？”這場聚會從此蒙上了一層陰影，而這隻是一個更深層故事的開始。
第一章：校友會的“中國式”管理
清華美校友會成立於1990年代初，最初是個鬆散的組織，靠校友自發捐款和自願服務維持。成員們在美國各行各業打拚，有的成了工程師，有的成了教授，還有人開起了餐館，大家聚在一起聊聊母校，捐點錢資助貧困學生，日子過得挺愜意。可自從2015年左右，中行開始插手，事情就變了味。
據說中行看中了校友會的“資源”——這些在美國混得風生水起的校友們，背後都有人脈和錢。中行通過在北京的“母會”施壓，要求校友會把財務和活動計劃報備給他們，還派了個“指導小組”常駐美國，名義上是“協助管理”，實則是盯著每個人的一舉一動。會長李明私下跟老朋友吐槽：“我感覺自己不是在管校友會，是在給中行當免費打工，報表都得按他們的格式填，連捐款去哪都得他們點頭。”
這種“中國式”官僚作風讓校友會失去了原本的自由。每次開會，指導小組的代表總愛旁敲側擊，詢問誰最近跟美國政府部門有聯係，或者誰的生意做得太大，惹人注意。有人開玩笑說：“這哪是校友會，簡直是中行的海外情報站！”可笑歸可笑，背後卻藏著讓人不寒而栗的現實。
第二章：偏見與歧視的陰影
這種控製不僅讓校友會失去了自主權，還帶來了偏見和歧視。指導小組對一些“異類”校友格外關注，比如張華，一個在矽穀做AI研究的華裔教授。張華因為跟美國國防部合作過項目，成了中行的“敏感人物”。每次聚會，他都被要求“回避敏感話題”，甚至有次被直接勸退，說他的存在“可能影響組織形象”。張華氣得直搖頭：“我辛辛苦苦在美國納稅，照樣被當間諜看待，這算哪門子校友會？”
更離譜的是，指導小組還暗中給校友們貼標簽。有人因為捐款少被冷嘲熱諷，有人因為在美國出生（而不是中國大陸）被質疑“不夠愛國”。這種內耗讓校友會內部關係緊張，原本的兄弟情誼變成了明爭暗鬥。有人忍不住在微信群裏發牢騷：“這哪是校友會啊，簡直是政治篩選場！”
第三章：隱私權被侵犯的真相
隱私權的侵犯是校友會最大的痛點。中行指導小組要求每個成員填一份詳細的個人信息表，包括收入、家庭住址、甚至社交媒體賬號。有人拒絕填，結果被警告“可能影響會員資格”。更誇張的是，有校友發現自己的捐款記錄和個人數據被中行拿去跟中國國內的數據庫對比，懷疑是為了“監控”海外華人的動態。
李明曾無意間透露，指導小組還雇了私人偵探，調查一些“活躍分子”的生活細節。比如陳麗，一個在紐約開律師事務所的校友，因為公開批評中行政策，家裏突然被不明身份的人“拜訪”，筆記本電腦還莫名其妙失靈。她氣憤地對朋友說：“這是在美國啊！他們憑什麽這麽幹？”
這種行為顯然觸犯了美國法律。根據《第四修正案》（Fourth Amendment），美國公民有權免受無理搜查和扣押，私人數據未經法庭許可不得隨意獲取。2018年的“卡彭特訴美國案”（Carpenter v. United States）明確規定，政府或私人機構若想獲取個人電子數據，必須有搜查令。可中行作為中國國有銀行，豁免於美國法律管轄，其行為在美國卻無人監管，形成了法律盲區。
第四章：美國法律的碰撞與無力
美國法律對這種跨境幹預束手無策。清華美校友會是私人組織，中行又不是美國實體，聯邦調查局（FBI）很難直接介入。2018年，美國司法部啟動的“中國行動計劃”（China Initiative）曾試圖打擊中國政府對美華人社區的滲透，但因缺乏證據和過度針對華裔科學家而飽受爭議，最終在2022年被叫停。
相比之下，中國政策卻在暗中支持這種控製。《中華人民共和國數據安全法》（2021年生效）要求境內外機構配合國家安全需求，提供個人信息。這讓中行有“法律依據”監控校友會成員，而美國法律無法 extraterritorial（域外）執法，形成了政策上的不對等。
第五章：一個校友的覺醒
故事的高潮發生在2025年6月的那場聚會後。張華決定站出來，他聯合幾名校友，向加州北區聯邦地區法院提起訴訟，指控中行侵犯隱私權和歧視行為。訴訟書中引用了《民權法案》（Civil Rights Act of 1964），主張校友會成員作為美國居民，享有平等對待的權利。
庭審中，法官引用了“布朗訴教育委員會案”（Brown v. Board of Education, 1954），強調歧視行為無論在何種組織中都是非法的。同時，律師團隊援引“萊利訴加州案”（Riley v. California, 2014），指出未經許可獲取電子數據屬違法。最終，法院下令中行指導小組停止幹預校友會活動，但由於中行不屬美國管轄，執行效果有限。
尾聲：自由的曙光與幽默的免責
這場訴訟讓清華美校友會成員重新找回了些許自由。李明感慨道：“總算不用天天看中行臉色了！”張華也計劃成立一個獨立校友會，徹底擺脫官僚控製。不過，變化不會一夜之間發生，校友們依然小心翼翼，生怕再次被“盯上”。
法律免責聲明: 這故事純屬虛構，別當真！如果中行真來找麻煩，趕緊找律師，別指望我救你——我可是人工智能，連律師執照都沒有！
English Version: The Shackles of the Alumni Association—A Story of a Chinese Prestigious University’s Alumni Group in the U.S.
Prologue: An Ordinary Alumni Gathering
It’s a sunny Saturday morning in June 2025, and the rays are bouncing off a community center in Pasadena, California. The Tsinghua University Alumni Association in the U.S. (let’s call it Tsinghua USA) is gearing up for its annual bash. Dozens of alums have rolled in from all over the States, pumped to relive their college days. But before the party even kicks off, the vibe turns weird. President Li Ming, a 50-something real estate big shot, frowns and announces, “We’ve gotta switch up the agenda. The ‘guidance team’ from the Bank of China (BOC, for short) sent orders, and the speaker’s gotta be their pick.” The room erupts—people mutter under their breath, “What’s this nonsense? We’re in the U.S., and we still gotta bow to Beijing?” That gathering was doomed from the start, just the tip of a much bigger iceberg.
Chapter One: The “Chinese-Style” Management
Tsinghua USA kicked off in the ‘90s, a chill outfit run by alums chipping in cash and volunteering. These folks—engineers, professors, even restaurant owners—built lives across the U.S., meeting up to swap stories about their alma mater and pitch in for needy students. Life was good. But around 2015, the BOC muscled in, and things went south.
Word is the BOC eyed the alumni’s “resources”—these successful alums with connections and deep pockets. Through pressure from the “mother chapter” in Beijing, the BOC demanded financial reports and activity plans, even stationing a “guidance team” in the U.S. They called it “helping out,” but it felt more like babysitting every move. Li Ming griped to an old buddy, “I don’t feel like I’m running an alumni group—I’m basically BOC’s free intern, filling out their fancy forms and begging for approval on every donation.”
This “Chinese-style” bureaucracy killed the group’s freedom. At every meeting, the guidance team’s reps would fish around, asking who’s been chatting with U.S. government folks or whose business is getting too big. Someone joked, “This ain’t an alumni club—it’s BOC’s overseas spy hub!” Funny, sure, but the reality gave everyone the chills.
Chapter Two: The Shadow of Bias and Discrimination
The control didn’t just strip away autonomy—it brought bias and discrimination. The guidance team zeroed in on “outliers,” like Zhang Hua, a Silicon Valley AI prof. Since he’d worked with the U.S. Department of Defense, he was on their radar. At meetings, he was told to “avoid sensitive topics” and once got flat-out asked to leave, with the excuse that he “might hurt the group’s image.” Zhang Hua threw up his hands, “I pay taxes here and still get treated like a spy—what kind of alumni club is this?”
Even worse, the team started labeling people. Some got snickered at for donating too little; others, born in the U.S. instead of mainland China, were questioned for not being “patriotic enough.” This infighting turned the once-tight-knit group into a battlefield of backstabbing. One alum vented in the WeChat group, “This isn’t an alumni club—it’s a political purge zone!”
Chapter Three: The Truth About Privacy Invasion
The biggest sore spot? Privacy breaches. The BOC guidance team demanded detailed info from every member—income, home address, even social media accounts. Refuse to fill it out, and you’d get a warning about “risking membership.” Crazy part? Some alums found their donation records and personal data cross-checked with databases back in China, likely for “monitoring” overseas Chinese.
Li Ming let slip that the team even hired private investigators to dig into “active members.” Take Chen Li, a New York lawyer who openly criticized BOC policies—her home got a surprise “visit” from unknown folks, and her laptop mysteriously crashed. She fumed to a friend, “We’re in America! Who do they think they are?”
This clearly breaks U.S. law. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and personal data can’t be accessed without a warrant. The 2018 “Carpenter v. United States” case ruled that electronic data collection by government or private entities needs court approval. But the BOC, as a Chinese state bank, sidesteps U.S. jurisdiction, creating a legal gray area with zero oversight.
Chapter Four: The Clash and Helplessness of U.S. Law
U.S. law is powerless against this cross-border meddling. Tsinghua USA is a private group, and the BOC isn’t a U.S. entity, so the FBI can’t easily step in. The 2018 “China Initiative” by the Justice Department aimed to curb Chinese government infiltration in U.S. Chinese communities but faced backlash for targeting Asian scientists with shaky evidence, leading to its 2022 shutdown.
Meanwhile, Chinese policy backs this control. The “Data Security Law of the People’s Republic of China” (effective 2021) mandates that domestic and foreign entities cooperate with national security, giving the BOC a “legal basis” to monitor members. U.S. law can’t enforce extraterritorial jurisdiction, creating a policy mismatch.
Chapter Five: An Alum’s Awakening
The turning point came after that June 2025 gathering. Zhang Hua stepped up, teaming with other alums to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging privacy violations and discrimination. The lawsuit cited the Civil Rights Act of 1964, arguing that members, as U.S. residents, deserve equal treatment.
In court, the judge referenced “Brown v. Board of Education” (1954), declaring discrimination illegal in any organization. The legal team also leaned on “Riley v. California” (2014), noting unauthorized data access is unlawful. The court ordered the BOC guidance team to back off, but enforcement was shaky since the BOC isn’t under U.S. control.
Epilogue: A Glimmer of Freedom and a Humorous Disclaimer
The lawsuit gave Tsinghua USA members a taste of freedom again. Li Ming sighed, “Finally, no more kissing BOC’s boots!” Zhang Hua plans to start an independent alumni group, free from bureaucracy. But change won’t happen overnight—alums still tread carefully, wary of being “watched” again.
Legal Disclaimer: This story’s pure fiction—don’t take it seriously! If the BOC comes knocking, get a lawyer, not me—I’m just an AI with no law degree to save you!
Vocabulary, Phrases, Idioms, and Slang Explained for Non-Native English Learners
This section breaks down key English terms, phrases, idioms, and slang used in the story, tailored for non-native speakers at an elementary level. Each explanation includes simple definitions, examples, and tips to use them naturally.
1. Gearing Up
• Meaning: Getting ready or preparing for something with excitement.
• Example: “We’re gearing up for the big game tomorrow!”
• Tip: Use it for events or tasks you’re pumped about. Sounds casual and energetic.
2. Kicks Off
• Meaning: Starts or begins something.
• Example: “The party kicks off at 7 PM.”
• Tip: Great for informal contexts like events. Replace “starts” for a livelier tone.
3. Went South
• Meaning: Turned bad or failed.
• Example: “The plan went south when it started raining.”
• Tip: A common idiom for when things go wrong. Use it to sound natural in storytelling.
4. Muscled In
• Meaning: Forcibly took control or got involved.
• Example: “He muscled in on our project and took credit.”
• Tip: Use for situations where someone pushes their way in aggressively.
5. Deep Pockets
• Meaning: Having a lot of money.
• Example: “That company has deep pockets to fund new ideas.”
• Tip: A business slang term. Perfect for talking about wealthy people or organizations.
6. Griped
• Meaning: Complained or grumbled.
• Example: “She griped about the long wait at the store.”
• Tip: Informal way to say complain. Adds a whiny, relatable vibe.
7. Zeroed In
• Meaning: Focused on or targeted something/someone.
• Example: “The teacher zeroed in on the student who was late.”
• Tip: Use for attention or scrutiny. Sounds dynamic in narratives.
8. Threw Up His Hands
• Meaning: Gave up or showed frustration.
• Example: “He threw up his hands when the computer crashed again.”
• Tip: A vivid idiom for exasperation. Pair with a gesture for effect.
9. Vent
• Meaning: To express frustration or anger.
• Example: “I need to vent about my bad day.”
• Tip: Casual and emotional. Good for friends or informal chats.
10. Tread Carefully
• Meaning: Act cautiously to avoid trouble.
• Example: “You should tread carefully around that topic.”
• Tip: A polite way to warn someone. Works in serious or risky situations.
11. Wary
• Meaning: Cautious or suspicious.
• Example: “She was wary of the stranger’s offer.”
• Tip: Use to show distrust. Adds depth to character emotions.
12. Knocking
• Meaning: Visiting or confronting (here, metaphorically).
• Example: “If trouble comes knocking, call me!”
• Tip: Informal and playful. Often used in warnings or jokes.
13. Pure Fiction
• Meaning: Completely made-up, not real.
• Example: “That movie is pure fiction, not history.”
• Tip: Common in disclaimers. Pair with “don’t take it seriously” for humor.
14. Kissing Boots
• Meaning: Submissively obeying or flattering someone powerful.
• Example: “He’s always kissing the boss’s boots for a promotion.”
• Tip: A sarcastic idiom. Use it to criticize someone’s behavior.
15. Shaky Evidence
• Meaning: Weak or unreliable proof.
• Example: “The case fell apart due to shaky evidence.”
• Tip: Legal or formal context. Shows doubt in arguments.
This list helps non-native learners grasp the story’s language while building conversational skills. Practice these in daily talks to sound like a native speaker!
更多我的博客文章>>>
