有關聯邦法官能否被彈劾,Grok是這麽說的。

Yes, a federal judge can be impeached. In the United States, federal judges, including those serving on district courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court, can be removed from office through the impeachment process outlined in the Constitution.

The process works as follows:

  1. Initiation in the House of Representatives: Impeachment begins in the U.S. House of Representatives. Any member of the House can propose an impeachment resolution, or an investigation can be initiated by the House Judiciary Committee. The grounds for impeachment are typically "high crimes and misdemeanors," a phrase from Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, which applies to federal judges as well as the President and other civil officers. This can include serious misconduct, abuse of power, corruption, or other offenses deemed incompatible with judicial integrity.
  2. Investigation and Articles of Impeachment: The House Judiciary Committee investigates the allegations. If sufficient evidence is found, the committee drafts and votes on articles of impeachment—specific charges against the judge. The full House then debates and votes on these articles. A simple majority (more than half of those voting) is required to impeach.
  3. Trial in the Senate: If the House approves the articles of impeachment, the case moves to the U.S. Senate for a trial. The Senate acts as the court, with senators serving as jurors. For Supreme Court justices or other high-profile cases, the House appoints managers to act as prosecutors, while the judge (or their legal counsel) presents a defense. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial if it involves the President, but for federal judges, the Vice President (as President of the Senate) or a designated senator typically presides.
  4. Conviction and Removal: After hearing evidence and arguments, the Senate votes on whether to convict. A two-thirds majority (at least 67 senators if all 100 are present and voting) is required to convict. If convicted, the judge is removed from office. The Senate can also vote to disqualify the judge from holding any future federal office, though this additional penalty is optional and requires a separate vote.

Historically, this process has been rare for federal judges. Since the founding of the United States, only 15 federal judges have been impeached by the House, and of those, 8 were convicted and removed by the Senate. The most recent example was Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr., who was impeached and removed in 2010 for corruption and perjury.

So, while it’s possible and has happened, impeaching a federal judge is an uncommon and politically charged event, reflecting the high bar set for lifetime-appointed judiciary members.

所有跟帖: 

和彈劾總統的門檻一樣高,除非民主黨支持否則不可能達到參院的2/3 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:52:30

沒錯。這才是三權分立的基本保證。總統又不能開除法官。看把下麵急得。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:56:50

也不絕對。所以要警告一下朱黨別太過分,太過的話,全紅的國會將會使用核選項,過半就行。這的確爭議很大,但是是朱黨開的頭 -ecolio157h7- 給 ecolio157h7 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:01:59

過半通過隻限和預算有關的法案 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:39:14

我記得連高院法官都能被彈劾 -仁雅居- 給 仁雅居 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:54:44

當然能,美國從建國以來隻彈劾過11個法官,全部是因為個人操守問題 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:58:17

法製也不是一個政見不同的反對黨法官說了算吧?一個區域性小法官就能對總統有這麽大的製約力,也算奇葩了。 -QinHwang- 給 QinHwang 發送悄悄話 QinHwang 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:02

而且讓轉運罪犯的飛機再飛回來,簡直荒唐。飛回來以後,what is the next? -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:03:42

為什麽說他們是罪犯,有過審判嗎?陪審團一致認為他們全部罪名成立嗎?就跟特朗普那樣? -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:06:27

這裏麵有個司法程序的問題。按照移民法要經過移民法庭審理獲得法官簽發的驅逐令才能驅逐,政府現在援引外國敵人法跳過了這個步驟 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 19:59:22

但是外國敵人法是隻有在美國遭到入侵時才適用的,政府認為委內瑞拉黑幫入侵了美國,這算不算入侵可否構成適用此法的條件存在爭議 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 20:01:58

當然可以彈劾,馬斯克早就說了。羅伯茲的意思是聽到判決後就嚷嚷彈劾法官,不太合適,不是200年以來約定俗成的。問題時之前 -ecolio157h7- 給 ecolio157h7 發送悄悄話 (132 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:38

讚同。不能用這樣的方法來解決判決的分歧。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:07:38

不是可不可以彈劾的問題,是為啥要彈劾的問題!哪有不按我的希望判決一個案子就要彈劾法官的道理?特朗普就是逆我者亡! -Penuium- 給 Penuium 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:52

這個左棍法官兩肋插刀為黑幫非移對抗移民局,主黨咋都是這種不著調的貨呢 -仁雅居- 給 仁雅居 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:19:32

憲法規定政府要受國會和法院監督,不服判決可以向上一級法院上訴 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 20:29:43

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!