WONG KIM ARK案子當時就有很多爭議,盡官最終他是贏了

本帖於 2025-01-26 15:35:12 時間, 由普通用戶 dancinghorse 編輯

當時也就是有很多法官的詮釋

時代不同了,那句jurisdiction可以再接受挑戰

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649

'That in the year 1890 the said Wong Kim Ark departed for China, upon a temporary visit, and with the intention of returning to the United States, and did return thereto on July 26, 1890, on the steampship Gaelic, and was permitted to enter the United States by the collector of customs, upon the sole ground that he was a native-born citizen of the United States.

'That, after his said return, the said Wong Kim Ark remained in the United States, claiming to be a citizen thereof, until the year 1894, when he again departed for China upon a temporary visit, and with the intention of returning to the United States, and did return thereto in the month of August, 1895, and applied to the collector of customs to be permitted to land; and that such application was denied upon the sole ground that said Wong Kim Ark was not a citizen of the United States.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!