為什麽美國國防工業的產品經常很貴?裏麵是ChatGPT的回答:

The high cost of U.S. defense industry products stems from a combination of factors related to their development, production, and regulatory environment. Here’s an overview of the main reasons:

 

1. Research and Development (R&D) Costs

        Cutting-edge technology: U.S. defense products often incorporate the latest advancements in fields like stealth, artificial intelligence, advanced sensors, and precision weaponry, which require extensive R&D.

        Long development timelines: Programs can take years or decades to design, test, and bring to operational status, with costs accumulating over time.

        High failure tolerance: Many technologies are experimental and may fail multiple times before succeeding, leading to sunk costs.

 

2. Small Production Runs

        Unlike consumer goods, defense systems are often produced in limited quantities due to the specialized nature of their missions. This reduces economies of scale, making each unit more expensive.

 

3. Stringent Testing and Certification

        Products must undergo rigorous testing to ensure reliability, safety, and performance in extreme environments. Meeting military standards often requires additional time, specialized materials, and processes.

 

4. Complex Supply Chains

        Defense products rely on highly specialized components, some of which are sourced from sole suppliers or require rare materials. Managing these complex supply chains adds to costs.

 

5. Labor and Expertise

        Highly skilled labor: Engineers, scientists, and technicians working on defense systems are among the most highly trained and compensated professionals.

        Specialized facilities: Manufacturing often requires unique facilities and tools that add to overhead costs.

 

6. Regulatory and Bureaucratic Requirements

        Compliance: Defense contractors must meet strict U.S. government regulations, including cybersecurity, export controls, and auditing standards, which increase administrative overhead.

        Oversight: Programs are subject to scrutiny from multiple agencies, leading to delays and additional costs.

 

7. Customization and Unique Requirements

        Defense systems are often custom-designed for specific missions or environments, requiring tailored solutions that increase costs compared to off-the-shelf products.

 

8. Geopolitical Considerations

        Strategic investment: The U.S. government sometimes funds expensive programs to maintain technological superiority over adversaries, even if costs are high.

        Export restrictions: Laws like the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) limit sales to foreign nations, reducing potential revenue and increasing unit costs.

 

9. Cost-Plus Contracts

        Many defense contracts are structured as “cost-plus,” where contractors are reimbursed for expenses and receive an additional profit margin. This can lead to less incentive to control costs.

 

10. Maintenance and Lifecycle Costs

        U.S. defense products are designed for long service lives, often requiring significant investments in maintenance, upgrades, and sustainment over decades.

 

11. Political and Economic Factors

        Congressional influence: Legislators often advocate for projects that benefit their districts, leading to inefficiencies or inflated costs.

        Industrial base protection: The government supports the defense industry as a strategic sector, sometimes funding projects to maintain jobs or capabilities even if costs are high.

 

In summary, the U.S. defense industry’s focus on innovation, reliability, and national security comes at a premium. While expensive, these systems are designed to provide unparalleled performance and ensure strategic advantages in defense scenarios.

 

所有跟帖: 

ChatGPT列出來的這些原因有些是合理的,有些則有改善的空間。 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:06:16

我們別忘了,俄羅斯的武器往往從參數上看都很牛,但到了戰場往往都很熊。看看俄羅斯,美國武器的製造非常保守嚴謹不是沒有道理的 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:14:23

非常保守嚴謹的製造和測試程序當然大幅提高成本,但俄羅斯的負麵例子證明這是有必要的。 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:16:29

理念不同,能達到效果就行。俄烏戰場上的無人機很簡單,業餘off the shelf 零件攢的,不受製裁影響就圖個便宜量足 -BeyondWind- 給 BeyondWind 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:26:40

軍火商要把那些給政客的捐款打到成本裏, -80前- 給 80前 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:32:44

相信有利益輸送。像B2轟炸機上千多美金的電熱咖啡壺中國家電廠商說十美金就能造,完全可國際招標先做樣品符合要求再正式訂貨 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:51:44

還有之前五角大樓跟中國製造商訂購美軍軍靴本為省錢,某些議員拿了美企政治獻金提出不能從共產國家訂貨非要花幾倍價格在美國訂購 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:55:51

這樣才會有某些不肖國防承包商給駐伊拉克美軍供貨,一包螺絲索取納稅人幾十萬美元的事,當時沒人覺得奇怪,事後國會審計才發現 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 14:59:42

其中有可能存在壟斷、暴利、濫用和腐敗現象,在加上美國製造文化中的高利潤現象。希望以後機器人能夠解決這個問題。 -pichawxc- 給 pichawxc 發送悄悄話 pichawxc 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/01/2025 postreply 15:17:42

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!