飛機著地時已在跑道中段,沒有起落架,沒有放開翅膀上的減速板,似乎不在做著陸操作的就撞上了土堆。 飛行員肯定有問題。

本帖於 2024-12-29 15:14:21 時間, 由普通用戶 voiceofme 編輯

我總結的飛機著陸的方向,和碰撞的土堆(現在看來是混領土加固的土堆)

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/3551223.html

https://www.the-sun.com/news/13178594/hero-pilot-emergency-landing-concrete-wall-south-korea/

https://www.thetimes.com/world/asia/article/cause-plane-crash-south-korea-boeing-737-800-kzf5s8s56

The Boeing 737-800 jet was making a normal approach with flaps extended. It was close to landing in the opposite direction, when its automatic data transmissions stopped at about 900 feet above the ground 1.5 miles from the airport.

The data feed failure came as the crew declared an emergency apparently after hitting birds causing a power loss on the right engine. They abandoned the landing and began to go around for a fresh approach. They would have retracted the flaps and landing gear while going around for this second attempt.

The pilots chose to land in the opposite direction on the same, relatively short runway. The aircraft came in fast, without deployment of the flaps and speed brakes that would normally slow it down. The flaps and landing gear are powered by the hydraulic system though the gear on the 737 can be extended manually in an emergency. It made a gentle touchdown on its engines and belly about halfway down the runway. Video showed that the door to the nose wheel housing was not open. The thrust reverser on the right engine, used to slow the plane once on the ground, was visibly deployed but not on the left.

 

所有跟帖: 

有意思的是,飛機在2-3分鍾前曾有個著陸準備,那時減速板(FLAP)卻是放好的,但放棄了那次著陸。 -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (871 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:17:07

好像放棄著陸後,減速板就收起了,但真正著陸時,減速板卻沒有再次展開。 沒有減速板,飛機就不會怎麽減速。 -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:21:05

估計就是飛行員因為之前的降落失敗而慌亂,造成了短時間的慌亂和失智,連正常的操作程序也遺忘了。飛機動力和操縱係統並沒有問題 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:22:08

韓國的飛行員有問題啊,幾年前在舊金山機場發生的韓國飛機尾部撞地的事件就是飛行員的問題。 -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:24:37

不一定是遺忘了。可能發動機爆炸後,損壞了係統 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:26:19

發動機爆的是右邊的,而右邊的發動機的reverser是展開起減速作用,但左邊的反而沒有展開。 -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (525 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:32:31

也可能右邊的是因為爆炸才展開,而飛行員根本沒有做著陸展開左邊的reverser操作。這和減速器(FLAP)沒有展開是一致 -voiceofme- 給 voiceofme 發送悄悄話 voiceofme 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:35:06

這個要看波音怎麽布線,以及發動機怎麽損壞的 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 15:36:04

鳥引起的。網上人們在說,那個機場在鳥遷徙路線上,當初建設時就因鳥的問題廣受質疑和反對 -victor1988- 給 victor1988 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2024 postreply 16:13:36

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!