CNN on Formal FBI people takeaways: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/politics/video/january-6-right-wing-claims-fbi-crowd-report-mccabe-cnntm-digvid
Full Report : https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011_0.pdf
CNN on Formal FBI people takeaways: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/politics/video/january-6-right-wing-claims-fbi-crowd-report-mccabe-cnntm-digvid
Full Report : https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011_0.pdf
The report specifies that FBI Confidential Human Sources (CHSs) who were present in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021, were not authorized to enter the Capitol, restricted areas, or to engage in or promote violence. The FBI's review concluded that none of the CHSs who were in D.C. that day were directed by the FBI to break the law or encourage others to do so. However, of the 26 FBI CHSs in D.C., 4 entered the Capitol and 13 entered restricted areas without engaging in violence, and these individuals have not been prosecuted??.
If you need further clarification or details, let me know!
The report explicitly states that none of the FBI Confidential Human Sources (CHSs) were directed by the FBI to encourage others to commit illegal acts or violence on January 6, 2021. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that any CHSs motivated or incited the protesting group to break into the Capitol building. The CHSs who entered the Capitol or restricted areas did so without authorization, and the review did not find that they had taken actions to encourage or lead the breach??.
If you need more specific sections from the document, let me know!
No, FBI Confidential Human Sources (CHSs) are not official FBI employees. They are individuals who provide information to the FBI on a voluntary basis, often from within groups or organizations of interest. CHSs can include people who are motivated by a variety of reasons, such as financial incentives, civic duty, or leniency in legal matters.
CHSs operate under the guidance of FBI handling agents and are subject to strict guidelines, including admonishments that clarify their relationship with the FBI. These include that they are not FBI employees, must abide by FBI directives, and must not engage in illegal actions on behalf of the FBI. CHSs may provide information either voluntarily or based on specific tasking by their handling agents?
•
ask vizard of OZ
-零不是數-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
09:17:09
•
Ask Biden curve( 拜登曲線),ask拜登 laptop,ask 通俄門…然will find out …
-Wtp003-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
09:35:45
•
我不知道自己在說什麽。我提供的方法去尋找什麽在那報告裏是可以驗證的
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
10:01:00
•
著什麽急~新任局長不是說上任後要揭露嗎~現在的報告是否完備不好說~~~
-奇怪怪-
♀
(132 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
12:45:49
•
不是GPT憑空回答,是GPT讀了報告後回答問題。 GPT有hallucination, 但閱讀理解很準確。
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
12:52:18
•
報告的信息準確完備嗎~相信新任FBI局長掌握更多信息~等著曝光吧~
-奇怪怪-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
12:57:21
•
這不是本貼要討論的問題。
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
12:59:33
•
我認為現在的報告是不完備的~要雙方都要提供事實把事情弄清楚~不能隻聽主黨公布的~~~
-奇怪怪-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
13:08:18
•
報告是DOJ 獨立調查(general inspector)做出的,不是主黨或和黨做的。
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
13:10:01
•
真是那樣的話公眾就不會質疑了~誰都知道這屆政府的FBI和DOJ是怎麽回事~~~
-奇怪怪-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
13:13:16
•
FBI失去很多公眾信任是現實~它的報告和國會J6委員會報告都不會打消公眾質疑~
-奇怪怪-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
13:01:42
•
但很多人在扭曲報告的內容。 本貼的目的是,找到報告的真正內容。 至於公眾相信不相信報告,那是另一回事。
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
13:03:44
•
此報告是否包括所有事實?拜登手下的DOJ是否有意漏掉或掩蓋某些關鍵事實等川普上台如能公開所有國會監控錄像再來驗證
-bucat-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/14/2024 postreply
18:00:06
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy