摘要：
"Schwartz said Quinnipiac conducted its own post-election review that ultimately focused on the “unusually high” number of self-declared undecided voters that were included in the results leading up to the 2020 elections.
To rectify the problem, Schwartz and his team decided to add more assertive follow-up questions into their surveys, in hopes of prodding so-called undecideds into revealing which candidates they are most likely to support.
The initial results during the 2022 Midterms were positive, Schwartz said, calling it “one of our most accurate elections ever.”"
