去過 那個百貨公司都知道,試衣間擠一個人進去都難, 更不用說兩人, 綜合各種證據後,法庭判強奸不成立。

來源: bustout 2024-01-28 09:51:19 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (15908 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ bustout ] 在 2024-01-28 13:18:18 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
J Brown
 January 28, 2024 5:23 am
 

I have said this from the very beginning. Aside from all the Lawfare antics, ANYONE who has ever been in Bergdorf’s, knows that these allegations are impossible. You cannot even bring in an extra blouse to the changing rooms, much less a man. And as Rudy said Trump would have been swamped with people the minute he stepped into the store.

 
 January 28, 2024 6:27 am
 
 Reply to  J Brown

Trump must have been wearing a wig and false beard and a nose prosthesis. Think Gerard Depardieu. Or Peter Sellers.

所有跟帖: 

這麽明確無誤的東西在法庭上證明不了,那個美女律師是蒙古培訓的吧? -玻璃坊- 給 玻璃坊 發送悄悄話 玻璃坊 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2024 postreply 11:10:37

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”