dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and

來源: 監考老師 2023-12-29 18:48:42 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (3604 bytes)

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/Advice-about-Possible-Loss-of-US-Nationality-Dual-Nationality/Dual-Nationality.html

Dual Nationality

 

Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.” Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals. Non-citizen nationality status refers only individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States. The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a national of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own nationality laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. For example, a child born in a foreign country to U.S. national parents may be both a U.S. national and a national of the country of birth. Or, an individual having one nationality at birth may naturalize at a later date in another country and become a dual national.

U.S. law does not impede its citizens' acquisition of foreign citizenship whether by birth, descent, naturalization or other form of acquisition, by imposing requirements of permission from U.S. courts or any governmental agency. If a foreign country's law permits parents to apply for citizenship on behalf of minor children, nothing in U.S. law impedes U.S. citizen parents from doing so.

U.S. law does not require a U.S. citizen to choose between U.S. citizenship and another (foreign) nationality (or nationalities).  A U.S. citizen may naturalize in a foreign state without any risk to their U.S. citizenship. 

U.S. dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country (or countries, if they are nationals of more than one). They are required to obey the laws of both countries, and either country has the right to enforce its laws.  Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals may result in conflicting obligations under the laws of each country.  U.S. dual nationals may also face restrictions in the U.S. consular protections available to U.S. nationals abroad, particularly in the country of their other nationality.   

U.S. nationals, including U.S. dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the United States. U.S. dual nationals may also be required by the country of their foreign nationality to use that country’s passport to enter and leave that country. Use of the foreign passport to travel to or from a country other than the United States is not inconsistent with U.S. law.  

You can find additional information on dual nationality and the potential challenges for international travelers here.

所有跟帖: 

出生地/血緣公民和歸化公民是不一樣的,這裏講的是出生地/血緣公民 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 18:54:00

非也,這裏包括了各種非美國國籍的獲得途徑。 -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:16:47

出生地/血緣公民是不能被剝奪的,歸化公民經過移民法庭裁決是可以被剝奪的 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 18:55:00

最大區別是歸化公民是需要宣誓的,出生地/血緣公民不需要 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 18:59:00

宣誓內容就是:I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegia -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 18:59:00

宣誓放棄對外國的一切責任和權利,所以法理上 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:00:00

既然說要對所屬每個國家效忠,那入籍宣誓裏說放棄效忠原國家就是空話,美國並無此要求。 -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:00:56

是不是空話,有沒有違反,由移民法庭裁決。 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:04:00

有人拿這過時的與現行規定不符的話來當擋箭牌。 -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:31:03

比如說一個巴西人加入美國國籍,按兩國法律他還保留巴西國籍。怎麽宣誓renounce? -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:11:10

出生地/血緣公民沒有這個限製。所以說歸化公民是二等公民也沒錯 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 19:06:00

與話題無關。allegiance能和間諜扯一起? -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2023 postreply 21:56:16

Again, 這由移民法庭裁決,看具體行為。 -seasnowman- 給 seasnowman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/30/2023 postreply 10:06:00

我引用的文字說得很明白,有多重國籍的必須遵從每個國籍所在國的法律。所以在法理上是不能背棄的。 -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (313 bytes) () 12/30/2023 postreply 13:12:51

把歸化公民不必遵守其他國籍法律的條文拿出來? -監考老師- 給 監考老師 發送悄悄話 監考老師 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/30/2023 postreply 17:05:05

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”