https://x.com/HilzFuld/status/1719638961428013176?s=20
I have a basic fundamental question I’ve yet to hear a valid answer to.
“Israel stole Palestinian land. They need to return it or else, all Palestinian resistance is justified. Now Israel is an apartheid state committing genocide against the Palestinian people.”
Just one question.
I’m not even talking about the fact that we have actual artifacts that say Palestine on them alongside a Star of David showing clearly that Palestine was Israel before 1948.
I’m not even talking about the fact that before any occupation, before there was even a state of Israel, Arabs were terrorizing Jews. See Hebron Massacre, 1929.
I’m not even talking about the fact that Israel has Arabs in every position in Israel including parliament members and Supreme Court justices.
I’m not even talking about the fact that the Palestinians have grown 6x so we either stink at genocide or that’s just another lie.
I’m not even talking about the fact that there was never an Arab Palestinian state in history, and a terrorist named Arafat woke up one morning and decided to call a group of Jordanians, Palestinians.
Forget all that. One question.
Should any country in the world that conquered land in a war or who took land from someone else, return that land?
Is a Native American violent uprising justified in the United States?
If the answer is no, if you understand that in war, nations take land, if you know history and know that Israel never started any war in history (it’s called Israel DEFENSE forces for a reason) but won them all, if you put all the facts I mentioned above aside, please tell me why Israel should return land that it took in a war it didn’t start but won, but that same standard doesn’t apply to any other country.
Why should Israel return any land when every other country took land in a war and no one is saying they need to return land?
I’d love a real answer.
Why is Israel held to a different standard?
If Israel should return land in your opinion, what other countries should also return land?
Canada? Australia? America? India? Poland? UK? Spain?
I’d love a real answer.
穀歌翻譯：
我有一個基本問題，我還沒有聽到有效的答案。
“以色列竊取了巴勒斯坦土地。 他們需要歸還它，否則，巴勒斯坦人的所有抵抗都是合理的。 現在以色列是一個種族隔離國家，對巴勒斯坦人民實施種族滅絕。”
隻有一個問題。
我什至不是在談論這樣一個事實：我們有真實的文物，上麵寫著巴勒斯坦，旁邊還有一顆大衛之星，清楚地表明巴勒斯坦在 1948 年之前是以色列。
我什至不是在談論這樣一個事實：在任何占領之前，甚至在以色列國出現之前，阿拉伯人就在恐嚇猶太人。 參見希伯倫大屠殺，1929 年。
我什至不是在談論以色列的每個職位上都有阿拉伯人的事實，包括議會成員和最高法院法官。
我什至沒有談論巴勒斯坦人已經增長了六倍的事實，所以我們要麽在種族滅絕中臭氣熏天，要麽這隻是另一個謊言。
我什至不是在談論曆史上從未有過阿拉伯巴勒斯坦國的事實，一個名叫阿拉法特的恐怖分子一天早上醒來，決定給一群約旦人打電話，叫巴勒斯坦人。
忘記這一切吧。 一個問題。
世界上任何在戰爭中占領土地或從其他國家手中奪取土地的國家是否應該歸還該土地？
美洲原住民的暴力起義在美國合理嗎？
如果答案是否定的，如果您了解在戰爭中，國家會奪取土地，如果您了解曆史並知道以色列在曆史上從未發動過任何戰爭（它被稱為以色列國防軍是有原因的），但贏得了所有戰爭，如果您將所有 拋開我上麵提到的事實不談，請告訴我為什麽以色列應該歸還它在一場不是它發動但贏了的戰爭中奪取的土地，但同樣的標準並不適用於任何其他國家。
當其他所有國家都在戰爭中奪取土地並且沒有人說他們需要歸還土地時，為什麽以色列要歸還土地呢？
我想要一個真實的答案。
為什麽以色列采用不同的標準？
如果您認為以色列應該歸還土地，那麽其他哪些國家也應該歸還土地？
加拿大？ 澳大利亞？ 美國？ 印度？ 波蘭？ 英國？ 西班牙？
我想要一個真實的答案。
