再轉一文;不以個人意誌為轉移

來源: Wtp003 2024-06-01 07:21:08 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (3451 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ Wtp003 ] 在 2024-06-01 07:28:36 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

https://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/30672/202405/28085.html

我大致上隻要預測,就沒出大錯。....另一個就是如果我之前的判斷都算搭調的話,那麽對未來的判斷就應該不會太離譜。“

作者博文都在,遠的不說近的川案是從開始就認為會判,即使中間最重要證人前川律師disaster 表現,連主媒都無語時結論也末變。

咋天川案巨大影響也hide了一個應該是更大的事件即現政府

的bad decision,促烏攻俄可能引起的核戰。跟貼中“律師昨天的評論提到了這個。川普案的判決上了頭條,淹蓋了另一真正重大的新聞,就是敗政府打算讓烏用美援武器攻擊俄境內目標。。。但普京清楚提到,美式導彈,烏軍沒人能操控。除非美軍或北約派人直接操控。這就觸發了普京的紅線。三戰(核戰)陰影籠罩“

這個律師文正好昨天我跟貼“大律師也看不明白“也提到,

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/culture/639142.html

引幾段律師話

The ‘story’ is 100% deeply fake news. Let’s read it critically. The headline was about Biden. Biden was the decider. The decision may be the most momentous decision he ever made. And yet, Politico’s article was devoid of a single quote from the alleged deciding leader of the Free World....

Apparently, not one single official in the Biden Administration wants the credit for this deplorable decision. They don’t even want to be attached to helping make it. And that’s why they did it lightning fast, right before the Trump verdict came out, so we would be so distracted by the verdict (a verdict we knew was coming anyway) that we’d completely miss Joe’s nuclear news nugget“

 

 

 

 

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”