握手。。。哈哈。。:)。。剛才

我說康德不願給例子其實是錯誤的。。。他很重視例子，隻不過不認為有必要給專業人士過多地講例子而已。。下麵是他的原話：

Examples and illustrations always appeared necessary to me, and hence actually appeared in their proper place in my first draft. But then I looked at the size of my task and the many objects with which I would have to do, and I became aware that this alone, treated in a dry, merely scholastic manner, would suffice to fill an extensive work; thus I found it inadvisable to swell it further with examples and illustrations, which are necessary only for a popular aim, especially since this work could never be made suitable for popular use, and real experts in this science do not have so much need for things to be made easy for them; although this would always be agreeable, here it could also have brought with it something counter-productive.

http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf