完全忽略人的本性? 重起爐灶?

來源: QualityWithoutName 2009-10-09 08:57:37 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (370 bytes)
I guess you are talking about behavior (or psycho) economics. The assumption that people are rational is 完全忽略人的本性? Maybe behavior (or psycho) economics can describe you better than rational assumption. I am probably more in rational side. But for most people, they are in between, so we need both (imperfect) theories, and they are complementary to each other.

所有跟帖: 

You can do a google, or go to amazon to buy a few books. -QualityWithoutName- 給 QualityWithoutName 發送悄悄話 QualityWithoutName 的博客首頁 (123 bytes) () 10/09/2009 postreply 09:50:33

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”