The 2010 ranking of Ph D programs in US universities by the National Research Council has been posted in the Chronicle of Higher Education. It can be found at http://chronicle.com/page/NRS-Rankings/321/
2010 NRC ranking of Ph D programs in US universities
所有跟帖:
• wow, Princeton的CS和EE以及Harvard的EE竟然在前3,看來是所謂的精英式教育. -胡宙- ♀ (44 bytes) () 10/04/2010 postreply 23:25:37
• holly shit, Brown的機械這麽強? -胡宙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/05/2010 postreply 00:05:15
• it is solid mechanics not mechanical engineering. -OrderedPair- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/05/2010 postreply 13:34:50
• 這是NRC的TRIAL項目。 程序是哈佛人編的,它把IVY的都排上麵了,和事實出入挺大。 -美大俠- ♂ (240 bytes) () 10/05/2010 postreply 07:37:06
• 更正,這個PROGRAM的三位作者都是普林斯頓研究生院的。所以他們把去年第81位提 高到第二位了。。看來這個TRICK會馬上被揭 -美大俠- ♂ (118 bytes) () 10/05/2010 postreply 20:03:58
• 哈哈哈哈,物理上S被嚴重歧視,落後於Penn,Chicago,PennState, 與UCI為伍.難怪大蝦氣S啦. -胡宙- ♀ (44 bytes) () 10/05/2010 postreply 21:38:49
• Read this -美大俠- ♂ (12626 bytes) () 10/08/2010 postreply 20:20:06
• 大家們信嗎?看這個, 文科就全變成普林斯頓第一了, MIT的工程何著還不如普林斯頓嗎! -美大俠- ♂ (536 bytes) () 10/06/2010 postreply 21:30:27
• 這個排名故意讓人暈呼,連起碼的能看懂的數據都沒有。都用回歸方程的分布結果顯 示。老百姓能懂什麽是回歸方程嗎?裏麵又用了什麽參數? -美大俠- ♂ (375 bytes) () 10/06/2010 postreply 22:32:14
• 不奇怪啦,大而強的多少有些弱項,就被平均下去了.小而精的就顯得突出了.麻工就常輸給加工. -胡宙- ♀ (48 bytes) () 10/07/2010 postreply 22:33:45
• Read this -美大俠- ♂ (79525 bytes) () 10/08/2010 postreply 20:21:26
• and this. Where is Princeton? -美大俠- ♂ (51466 bytes) () 10/08/2010 postreply 20:22:35
• if you don't know what size means, ask your wife:-) hahahaha -胡宙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/08/2010 postreply 22:12:49